Laserfiche WebLink
22 February 1996 <br /> Page 15. <br /> assured of. Now, it is big said it is a Wetland and that they are in solation and that the <br /> cost will be borne by them. <br /> fir. Rosenberg stated the next hearing must proceed and they would be given time later. <br /> ssues have been raised that are very complex which have to do, and he suggested they <br /> think about this, they are about a situation where you may be placing materiA <br /> including water on the propel of another person. The Cor'ri=sion has heard nothing <br /> about the fact that, whether or not there is permission from the owner of the adjacent <br /> property to place water on his property. That is one issue, there are others which also may <br /> affect the adjacent prop, the property behind their house. <br /> �. aue stated they know that property is in the name of Santuit Realty Trust. <br /> 1Ir. Rosenberg stated they could tam about it Inter as mother hearing had to be called. <br /> After the Trotto hearing had been called at :30 and was continued, the Laues were given <br /> another eve nfinutes. <br /> fir. Rosenberg expanded on the situation, the Commission has received at least one <br /> complaint from an adjacent property owner with respect to an aaffect on their land as a <br /> result of the diversion of water and in that connection it has cone to the Cor-nmission's <br /> attention that there was, and he assurnes it is proposed to continue to extend a pipe which <br /> comes from the street onto the Laue's land, over the back oftheir land onto the adjacent <br /> land of a d*d party. On that land of the fl*d party, there is an isolatede' dmd. The <br /> Laue's house plans, nor anything else that has either been shown to the building <br /> department or anyone else, indicated that there was going to be inserted into their property <br /> a pipe canying water onto the adjacent property. Even if it were shown on the plans and <br /> even if the Comnussion or any other entity in the town wanted to permit that, wetlands or <br /> not; it could not be permitted without the consent of that third party. <br /> Also, there is the question of placement of cin brush and other material and whether or <br /> not that placement is on the property of the ted party. Some of thest diin , with respect <br /> to to whatever is on their property, all the Comn ssion has is a plot plan, not an engineered <br /> plan, it seems that the Conum' sion and the County Extension Service could work with <br /> there to help with those problms, but where and to the extent that this problem extends t <br /> the property of`a third party or to the extent that any chimes in their land las caused any <br /> changes or any affects on the adjacent property, the Corn.r usion cannot help with this, not <br /> unless they come in with pe n�ssion from those people. The representatives of this <br /> Commission and the County Extension Service would be happy to consult with you on the <br /> removal of the material placed whether on their property or adjacent but have no authority <br /> to legitimatize and authorize any act ity which affects third parties, without their consent <br /> and without their actually becoming party to any application that is made hire. <br />