5/2/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

2 May 1996 Page 5. ir. Rosenberg asked if this is the one that has the outstanding enforcement order for the beach area? Mr. Sherman stated there are several enforcement situations with fir. Vining but this is the one where a bulldozer removed a lot of vegetation. The wall was not part of the violation but will be incorporated into the revegetation plan; he made it clear it is separate. fir. Sharpe asked if Xft. C nsahi had contracted to do the work? hr. Cor aM stated Sabana was contacted and wiU send the proposal for his services for su ' 'on of what is going to be clone. Public comments: none. VOTE., 1 lotion made and seconded to close pending receipt of DEP number and a coalition to incorporate this work with the previous enforcement order. Unanimous Vote. CLOSED PENDING. 7:30 'WILLIAM CHEMO, 23 Spoondrift Warr, continued from 11 January 1996. A& Sherman stated a request has been received for a continuance. Don Schall was hired who did a reve etati n plan. Peter Fletcher is meeting with him next week to determine which wetland line to adopt. CONTENUED TO 30 MAY 1996 AT 7;30 P.NL AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. 7:40 NUS EE LAND VESTMENT TRUST, 608 Great Neck Road South, continued from 4 April 1996. 11r. Sherman advised that he and Mr. SiMa discussed the fact that the salt marsh was not delineated so it will be stated in whatever a tion that is made that the salt marsh is not part of it. There is salt marsh on the property but that will have to be re-delineated at later point in time when the project comes in. A& Sika agreed. B91 Silvia presented revised plans. The only question is when the Agent walked the area, did he consider the upland area as protected? �&. Shun stated if the people Nft. Sii is working for want to withdraw those, since they were first shown as wetlands, and there are some wetlmd species down there, the cales would be needed to prove it one way or the other. IW. Sihia agreed.