My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/31/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/31/1996 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:06:31 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 2:19:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/31/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 October 1996 <br /> Page 7. <br /> Public comments: none. <br /> VOTE; Motion made and seconded to close contingent upon receipt of further <br /> guidance on the Rivers Act and the DEP number. Unanimous vote. <br /> CLOSED PENDING. <br /> 8:30 GEORGE W. SKOGSTROM JR. to construct and, maintain retaining <br /> walls and stairs; repair and maint r existing retammm�g warms; construction of <br /> a shed; removal of trees; and to do vista pruning, with maintenance in <br /> perpetuity at 157 Tim erlane Drive. Mr. S ogstrom presenting. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he net on the property with Mr. S ogstrom. There is an <br /> arborist report and the standard protocol will apply. Mr. S ogstrom is aware <br /> that there will he a meeting between someone from the Commission and <br /> whomever is doing the pruning prior to the start of work. 'There were existing <br /> walls neeting repair in the same footprint. <br /> Mr. Skogstrom advised the shed is underneath an existing deck. It is above <br /> retaining wall and will not affect water flow. Trees proposed for removal are <br /> shown with an X inside a circle. <br /> Mr. Sharpe asked if some were 14 feet from the pond. Mr. S ogstrom stated <br /> they were. The inside of some of trees are gone, eaten by ants and other trees <br /> have been damaged.. <br /> Nk. Sherman stated all of these are subject to an on-site. It does not mean <br /> that every tree marled will be allowed to be taken down. Each one will have <br /> to he tagged before removal. <br /> Mr. S ogstrom provided abutter notification and will call DEP for a number. <br /> Mr. l e rosiers commented on the height of the retaining walls. <br /> . It was noted <br /> they are over 5 feet but are pre-existing. Mr. Sogstrarn advised that around <br /> the driveway he is going to complete a walI that was started that is below <br /> feet. <br /> Public comments: Jim Walsh asked how this petition could be predicated on a <br /> plot plan that was originally for the hone? He would hke to know the <br /> diameter and asked for a revegetation plan. He questioned the Commission <br /> accepting a plan without a stamp. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.