Laserfiche WebLink
- 15 May 1997 <br /> Page 7. <br /> Mr. Grotke stated some were done that were 15 feet. <br /> Joanne Fox stated variances were given; they are sitting on the street. It is <br /> the same situation here. As a neighbor and member ofthe community she <br /> objects. <br /> Atty. Charles Krattenmal er stated New Seabury went into Chapter 11 and <br /> asked if New Seabury is a party to this application process. It was noted the <br /> application is on behalf of Mr. Glaser. <br /> W. Green asked if it is known he is the owner? Mr. Rosenberg stated before <br /> the Commission could act and close, it would have to have the attestation <br /> signed by the treasurer of the town. He read Born the form. Further, it would <br /> have to be told that all taxes with respect to that property have been paid. <br /> The Attorney asked if Chapter 11 has any affect on the process? Mr. <br /> Rosenberg stated that would have to be addressed in the certification by the <br /> Town to the Commission and if such is received, it would have to be accepted.. <br /> If not, the Commission cannot act. <br /> John and Elizabeth Cramer advised they live on great River year-round. <br /> They have dealt with Aft. Sherman and know his sensitivity. Anything done <br /> to compromise the wetland on Jehu comes down stream. <br /> Mr. Grot ke stated, garage or not, the shape of the house will remain the <br /> same. They started the process one year ago, moving the house back at least <br /> once and redesigned at least twice. The footprint of the house is very srna ; <br /> there are some 4600 s.f. They cannot build a full two story. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked the square footage of the first floor? It is 2400 s.f Of lot <br /> coverage, they are at one-half of zoning allowed lot coverage. <br /> Aft. Lauer stated he is using as a basis the entire lot. <br /> Mr. Green stated it seems it is not a hardship. They bought a small lot and <br /> are trying to put a grand house on it. Mr. Grotke stated it is not a <br /> magnificent house. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested considering whether the burden of proof has been met <br /> if going below the 50 feet. <br /> Mr. Green felt they have not reached the point where they cannot scale down. <br /> The deck may be achieved, with a variance, in another area of the house. <br />