My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/18/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
09/18/1997 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2018 5:34:47 PM
Creation date
2/26/2018 1:58:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/18/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
18 April 1997 <br /> Page lo. <br /> Mr. Desrosiers stated they cid not show an initial fee for probes. He asked if <br /> in the first year there should not be a probe? Mr. Rosenberg stated it is in <br /> there. <br /> Mr. Hamilton stated prior to construction, monies would be put forth. Mr. <br /> esrosiers stated they should fund one probe and one extra. <br /> Mr. Hamilton reviewed the language changes. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked if nothing would be done until spring of 2000Mr. <br /> Hamilton stated yes, in terns of nourishment. He advised a meeting will be <br /> scheduled at New Seabury inviting individual owners. He wiR advise of the <br /> specific time. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised one change he discussed with Jim Mahala was the <br /> length of the permit. He would recommend it go on for three years and to <br /> then seed an extension to go another five years, under Chapter 172 and the <br /> Act. The Commission has the ability to make the first Order of Conditions <br /> good for five years. It could be extended for a longer period of time. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg agreed, as long as there is the agreement that with respect to <br /> the escrow fund that all the money will be put is as set by profiling and there <br /> will be enough pion y for cost escalation also. The Commission can extend for <br /> as long as possible, subject to the ...............for failure to carry through in any <br /> year to do proffling and nourishment required by it. Mr. Sherman added., and <br /> asg DEQ' to issue a Notice of Ikon-Compliance. Air. Rosenberg stated the <br /> Commission will have to see the escrow agreement and someone charged with <br /> overseeing it before any work is done. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the Order will be issued for a five year period and they <br /> will be required six months before expiration slate to request an extension. He <br /> thanked.Mr. Hamilton for the cooperative manner in which this was handled. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated it should be required that even additional party shall <br /> file an amendment to become party to the order. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if they do not sign on to this and want to repair their <br /> revetment, the Commission can just say no. <br /> Public comment: none. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.