Laserfiche WebLink
May 1999 <br /> 'age 5. <br /> Mrs. Piscatelli stated it was not and they would have to go to the State. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if they do not like the decision, redress is through <br /> Superior Court. Mr. Pis atehi stated he intends to. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close the hearing. Un.ammous Vote. <br /> HEARING CLOSED. <br /> 7:10 JEANNE G. SYLVES ER+ for a Determination of Applicability on the <br /> proposed relocation of a fence at 2 Great River Road. Horace Sylvester was <br /> present. They are moving the fence to the edge of the property line. <br /> Mr. Sherman had no comment. <br /> Publiccomment: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to Find negative. Unanimous Vote. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br /> 7:15 CHARLES M. LO RON for a Determination of Applicability on <br /> construction of a 4' x 30' walkway and four sono tube footings ' off existing <br /> foundation; construction of 1 ' x 14' deck on the north side with 3 -sono tub <br /> footings; and on the lank side of the deck will be a planting zone of 31 s.f. <br /> using 36 two gallon native shrub and tree species to restore habitat currently <br /> used as lawn area at 17 S antuit Lane. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised a plan was received with a straight shot of equal <br /> compensation. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find negative. Unanimous vote. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION <br /> 7:40 DAVID LUDO, 65 River Road, continued from 4 March 1999. Michael <br /> Grotke was present. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised this was being held up by Natural Heritage. <br />