Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked if any wetlands were involved? Mr.. ' l stated none. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find negative. Unanimous vote. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br /> 7:10 LADY SKIPPER ASSOC. LTD, ET AL for installation of a private <br /> drinking water well, trench for waterline to dwelling, construction of new <br /> single family dwelling, driveway, sub-surface septic system, utilities, deck <br /> and appurtenances at 11 Lady slipper Lane. sweetser Engineering <br /> represented the applicant. The well went in several months ago. It is s' <br /> from the wetland. There is two sets of flagging, the red not done by them. <br /> Edge of Wetland was set up by Brad lull. Most of the work is outside of the <br /> 100' limit. Trenching of the water line is the only thing that comes within <br /> the Commission's jurisdiction, <br /> Mr. Sherman would be happy to call the matter closed if they revegetate the <br /> line. He was told it is called for in the Notice f Intent in mitigating <br /> measures. shrubs will be specified in the Order of Conditions. <br /> Publiccomment: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to close the hearing. Unanimous vote. <br /> HEARING CLOSED. <br /> 7:15 STEPHEN LEO HUGHES to construct a single family house and <br /> garage, Title V septic system, waterline service, deck and pervious driveway <br /> at 26 Quaker Run Road. John Slavinsky presenting. Abutter reeei is were <br /> provided. Plan revision date is 26 May. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked the Commission to reaffirm policy tonight. He cannot <br /> roam around lots looking for things. In the performance standards, it is <br /> demanded that tap of bank stakes be numbered and house corners be lettered <br /> so he will know where he is. Additionally, he asked that the house be rove <br /> further back. He cited section C3 of the Nutrient Loading Regulation. He <br /> then read from section 5. He stated it is within the Commission's power to <br /> do all they can to mitigate nitrogen loads even if the septic is out of the 100' <br /> jurisdiction, as it is in this case. He asked the applicant to consider some <br /> means ofreducing the nits.e level by modification f the plan. <br /> 3 June 1999 <br />