My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/3/1999 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/3/1999 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2018 5:29:25 PM
Creation date
2/26/2018 2:49:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/03/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 4. <br /> Mr. Sherman continued with a reading from Regulation 29, section B. He <br /> recommended putting this on hold to give there a chance to consider a plan to <br /> reduce the scope of altred land and increase the buffer strip. It is a very <br /> large house. <br /> Mr. slavinsky stated the way he reacts the table, the o' buffer strip, <br /> minimum of 3 ' buffer strip, seems to be useless unless it is 165'. M . <br /> Sherman stated it does not say useless, in actuality, if the environment were <br /> to be preserved, Mashpee wouldn't permit any more houses, but there is <br /> ample evidence that increasing the buffer strip does increase mitigation. I <br /> the buffer strip is increased, the nitrogen will decrease. Mr. slay insky stated <br /> if he rums the program that Mr. Sherman n has from the Cape Cod Commission <br /> on nitrogen loading, he would take a treed lot, cut down eery tree and pave <br /> it, that program says he decreases nitrogen. Mr. Sherman stated the <br /> program has a built in flava that benefits the builder. <br /> Mr. Hughes stated if the Commission wanted a smaller house, he could do <br /> that. He asked chat would be acceptable? <br /> Mr. Rosenberg suggested moving the house back. It is o' from the road and <br /> only o' from the top of bank. He suggested they swap it or move it up 29' to <br /> the road. <br /> Mr. Hughes stated the original drawing used was too close to the road., the <br /> garage was too close to the road. Their intent is to get as close to the water <br /> s they can; everyone along the street is closer. Mr. Sherman stated they <br /> went in prior to the regulation. <br /> Mr. wollenhaupt suggested moving it back 10' to the road. <br /> Mr. slavins y stated they could change the architecture of the house. <br /> Mr. Hughes stated it is a waterfront lot and he can hardly see the water. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated vista pruning could be accommodated at a later date. <br /> Mr. sla insky stated they will reconfigure the house. <br /> There was discussion of taxes owed. Atty. Alex Watt was present and <br /> advised taxes will be paid subsequent to the Commission's decision. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> Tune 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.