Laserfiche WebLink
26 August 1399 <br /> Page 3. <br /> VOTE: Motion remade and seconded to make a positive determination unless <br /> within five days the applicant agrees to a continuance to <br /> September 1399 at 8:40 p.m. Unanimous Note. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED. <br /> +7:10 CHARLES PETERSEN for proposed additions to a dwelling and deck <br /> at 223 Hooppole Road.d. Mr. Petersen was present with Charles Theis. John <br /> Johansen stepped don for this hearing. <br /> Ms Boretos stated they are looking to put on an addition and deck that is <br /> approximately 2o' to the BVW. She asked there to push back the addition. <br /> Mr. Petersen stated that would be a problem as there is a bathroom between <br /> the structures. Ms Boretos proposed mitigation planting in lieu of shifting <br /> back the addition. This was agreed; The area would'be ' wide by 15' long. <br /> Mr. Green asked why this could not be moved back? Mr. Petersen advised <br /> plumbing in the existing structure would have to be rebuilt. They would have <br /> to move the bathroom and kitchen because of the -say they sit in the existing <br /> house. They would not be able to get into the new house. It would be very <br /> costly. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked if there was no net loss? Ms Boretos stated yes. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked if there is an increase in bedrooms? There is. Mr. <br /> Sherman stated even though the system could accommodate the increase, the <br /> Commission. has a policy on nitrogen loading. He suggested Ontinuing to <br /> allow further discussion. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons requested an architectural pian. It is being worked on. <br /> Mr. Theis advised they are scheduled with Board of Appeals in September. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing at the request <br /> of the applicant to 23 September 1999 at 7:25 p.m. <br /> Unanimous Vote. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED. <br />