Laserfiche WebLink
September 1999 <br /> Page 5. <br /> annual beach nourishment. She stated if the toe becomes unstable, they may <br /> not errant to do this again. Mr. tarot ke stated there is not much room to do <br /> anything besides beach nourishment. Ms Boretos will meet with Mr. trot ke <br /> out there. she stated if they rebuild the tees on top it ready lawn with <br /> shrubs at the edge. She suggested approval and she will go out for a pre- <br /> work <br /> re- <br /> wor on-site. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> i <br /> VOTE; emotion made and seconded to close the hearing. Unanimous vote. <br /> HEARING CLOSED. <br /> 7:35 NEW SEABURY, 3 ocean Bluff Dr., continued hearing. <br /> VOTE: -Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 7 October 1999 <br /> t the request of the applicant. Unanimous vote. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED. <br /> 7:40 JEANNE S. MANTEL to demolish an existing pre-FIRM three <br /> bedroom dwelling and remove existing utility services and to construct <br /> three bedroom house conforming to flood zone standards with decks, utility <br /> services, Title v septic system with denitrification component at 2 <br /> Monor oscoy Road. Dave sanicki provided abutter notification receipts. The <br /> existing dwelling on site does not conform to construction standards. It is in <br /> the flood zone. The house will be demolished and removed. The new house <br /> will be sitting further away from the salt marsh. A. landscape plan prepared <br /> by Laughed Landscaping was part ofthe filing. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg questioned the proposed pervious driveway going all the way <br /> around. Mr. wirsen pointed out it is 29' to the salt marsh. <br /> Mr. Sherman has been to the property but was not aware that the driveway <br /> came up so far. They are now moving inside the o' with the driveway. Mr. <br /> wirsen stated it is less than 15' from the driveway to the salt marsh. They <br /> are back-filling the bulkhead and doing planting. <br /> Mr. Sherman questioned whether or not them is a net loss of habitat. Ms <br /> oretos stated this lot was probably all salt marsh and is probably historic <br /> tidelands.. Chapter 91 has jurisdiction. Mr. Sherman asked what are the <br /> wildlife impacts. The bylaw calls for a o' setback He never saw the plans <br />