Laserfiche WebLink
November 1999 <br /> Page 12. <br /> Atty. Creeden referred to the Request for Determination of Applicability and <br /> stated the work proposed to be done in the street right of way. Mr. & Mrs. <br /> Jacobs permission for the work to be done should be with the filing. They' are <br /> proposing arborvitae for screening as requested by the Jacobs. The <br /> Peninsula Council has given permission also. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons wanted to be sure it was adequate and asked if New <br /> seabur is engineers checked that? Atty. Creeden did-not know that they did. <br /> Mr. Kuchinsk .did the c les; they were designed for a 25 year storm. He <br /> used the rationale method. <br /> Mr. Fitzsimmons asked if they could save that large tree? They will work <br /> around it. <br /> Public comment: lir. Jacobs stated he had no problem with the project. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to accept the amendment as proposed. <br /> Unanimous vote. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find negative. Unanimous vote. <br /> "ENDMENT ACCEPTED/LEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br /> 8:40 IIATT EW VELLI ER for a Determination of applicability on a <br /> request to build an ' x 12' shed at 13 Sand Dollar Lane. Mr. Kelliher was <br /> present. <br /> Ms Boretos stated the shed is shown approximately 12' off the corner of the <br /> Douse according to the plan. <br /> Public comment: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find negative, Unanimous Note. <br /> NEGATIVE DETERMINATION. <br /> 8:45 BERT MC CONNELL to amend the ender of Conditions for SE 43- <br /> 1782 to create a view corridor and for vista pruning at 7 Harbor Ridge Drive. <br /> Mr. McConnell was present, <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the plan con orms to guidelines and recommended <br /> approval. <br />