My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/27/2000 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
07/27/2000 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2018 5:12:21 PM
Creation date
2/28/2018 12:48:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
27 July 2000 <br /> Page 4. <br /> good place for them to live. Subsequent to treatment, as they recover some <br /> of that habitat, it will be a good place for them. Mr. Smith stated their <br /> position right now is that MEPA is not triggered. They have talked with the <br /> Mate and that is their feeling at southeast region, <br /> Mr. Sherman asked if IEP at the southeast region told there that, or MPA <br /> told you that? Mr. Smith stated both. He talked with the Director of the <br /> MA program and he has talked with southeast region and the various <br /> criteria that trigger MEPA is not at this time. The MEPA process would not <br /> allow them to meet this window of opportunity in September. <br /> Mr. Smith Mated the key challenges, inactivation, and proper dosage of the <br /> inactivent, maintain pH in the pond and what they have identified as the <br /> deep application is. a good thing. They will sample the adjoining areas to see <br /> what is there, s suggested by Mr. Sherman. e asked r. Brian Howes to <br /> say something about the baseline information, the health of the pond, the <br /> data collected last year. <br /> Dr. Howes distributed material and stated it was related to the Commission's <br /> decision on the Notice of Intent; it is a reference document. They are <br /> involved in habitat restoration. They started the project in 1993 and 2000 so <br /> the statements he makes are based upon historic data and on high frequency <br /> sampling every two weeks in 1999 and every three weeks starting in March <br /> 2000. The plume is from the old treatment facility, now closed. The nitrogen <br /> plume is dying away. The load into this pond of nitrogen is dropping. <br /> Phosphorus moves much slower, that plume will continue to discharge to the <br /> pond for a long period of time. The issue is that you will start seeing a <br /> system enriched with phosphorus and impoverished with nitrogen. Blue- <br /> green algae blooms are a problem in Cape ponds. <br /> At issue here is that during the winter there is plenty of oxygen but by June <br /> there is no oxygen in the bottom water and that will exist until fall turnover. <br /> Over time, this will move up a bit but even year it goes anoxic at the same <br /> depth. The result is a buildup of phosphorus. The problem is when the <br /> system turas over in the fall with the wind, which causes the big blooms. <br /> That is what they are going to get rid of. The idea is to strip all of this out <br /> and bury it in the sediment. The eutrophic state of the pond is shown in <br /> table. Ashurmet Pond is Meso-Eutrophic.' The entire volume of the <br /> hypohmnion becomes anoxic during summer and herefore is devoid of higher <br /> animal and plant life. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.