My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/03/2000 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
08/03/2000 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2018 5:14:08 PM
Creation date
2/28/2018 12:49:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/03/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
{ <br /> 3 August 2000 <br /> Page 2. <br /> an issue of wetland B having potential vernal pool characteristics, can be <br /> shifted further towards Isolated wetland A. <br /> IVH Sherman stated he would like the terminology "not a vernal pool" <br /> changed with a revised plan because it is unsure whether it may or may not <br /> be, it has not been established. Mr. Gray agreed. He reviewed the plan <br /> details. There are two isolated wetlands. <br /> Mr. wirsen asked if there was mitigation for driveway relief? Mr. Gray <br /> asked if he was asking post construction or during construction? Mr. wi. sen <br /> stated both, Mr. Gray advised it is a gravel driveway and there are contour <br /> changes and it is not anticipated that post-construction erosion will occur. <br /> Mr. Gray asked what needs to be staked? Mr. Sherman stated the work limit <br /> is a curve so stakes are needed every 20' to show the shape and it would be <br /> enough to do the to nearest corners of the patio on that side. He suggested <br /> the leach pit be staled and on the side facing southeast, -the two garage <br /> corners staked. There should be work limit stakes along the driveway. <br /> It was noted final plans must be filed at least five days before the hearing for <br /> public viewing. <br /> The Chair called for public comments: <br /> Gertrude Boyd stated she lues on the corner of Uncle Edwards and Alma and <br /> had been informed year after year that this was wetland and nothing could <br /> ever be built on it. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated whoever told her that was not defining wetlands <br /> according to the State Act. <br /> The Chair stated the Commission cannot Ileal with what she or anyone else <br /> was told. There are state and Town Regulations that provide standards for <br /> judging wetlands. Under those standards, that area being talked about is not <br /> defined as a wetland. <br /> Names Corbett of 4 Alma load stated that is wetland. It is a habitat for <br /> mosquitoes. A tree was cut on his property and he received a letter that he <br /> was within 100 foot of a wetland. Mr. Sherman stated not the whole road. <br /> He stated no law sags you cannot build, only that you must get a permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.