Laserfiche WebLink
January 2001 <br /> Page 16. <br /> Mr. Shea stated he is against this, it does not meet the performance <br /> standards. If they want to go forward with the process, they should <br /> appeal. -Mr. Sherman asked if he would then just vote a denial. Mr. <br /> Shea stated he would. <br /> Mr. Shaw stated it appears to be too restrictive based on comments made <br /> by the audience and others. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated 'i tris continues, .there is a deadlock and we don't <br /> have any vote that constitutes a permit which would automatically kick it <br /> up to DEP anyway. - Ms Boretos asked what that does for the bylaw? <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it would not be approved under the bylaw and he <br /> supposed they could sue the Commission for inaction. <br /> Mr. Ellis stated this contract is a three year contract. t the end of three <br /> years, could they come back to s Frith a newfiling? It was agreed they <br /> could. He stated it would allow dredging once in the three year time <br /> frame and then they could come back. <br /> The chair called for another motion, <br /> NOTE: Motion made and seconded to accept the recommendations of <br /> The Assistant Agent with the exception of , with a minimum <br /> 50' wide channel, everything else the same. Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Shea was opposed. <br /> HEARING CLOSET . <br /> 7:30 CHILTON DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., 138 Waterway, continued <br /> from 16 November mber 2000. <br /> 'ISE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing to 1 <br /> January 2001 at 7:35 p.m. at the request of the applicant. <br /> Unanimous Note. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED. <br /> 7:35 NEW SEABURY PROPERTIES L.L.C. to enlarge an existing water <br /> hazard adjacent to the 18th green of the green course and the 9thgreen of <br /> the,blue course at the New Seabury y Golf Club. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue the hearing at the <br /> Request guest of the Applicant to 18 January 2001 at 7;40 p.m. <br />