Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> The vice Chairman determined the matter could not be heard <br /> as there has not been sufficient time for Commission/Public <br /> revi ear; five days are required by law. <br /> r. Sanic} i, provided two ) copies of said recommendations <br /> to the Commission for the file, and respectfully requested a <br /> continuance on the Hearing in this matter. <br /> MOTION: Ralph Shaw rade a motion to continue the Hearing in <br /> this matter to November 15, 2001 at 7 : 35, at Applicant ' s request; <br /> which motion was seconded by Carole Moore and so voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> 7 : 20 Catherine Warner for Determination of Applicability on <br /> a proposed Title v septic systems upgrade at 21 Seaview Avenue, <br /> Assessors Map 118, Block 43 . <br /> The vice Chairman recognized Dave Sanicki, Cape Islands <br /> Engineering, representing the Applicant, who reported the <br /> proposed project is located within the buffer zone of a flood <br /> zone. This is a septic system upgrade. <br /> There being no Commission or public comment, the vice <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: Carole Moore made a Motion for a Negative <br /> Determination; which Motion was seconded by kalph Shaw and so <br /> voted unanimously. <br /> Susan Fort for Determination of Applicability on <br /> proposed replacement of existing landscape timbers at 76 <br /> Spoondrift Way, Assessors Neap 112, Block 42 . <br /> The vice Chairman recognized Dave Consalve, representing <br /> Applicant . <br /> Making reference to the Plans, Diane Boretos explained the <br /> project consists of replacement of existing railroad tie walkway <br /> leading to the pier. She requested the addition of a gravel <br /> apron; to which Nor. Consalve agreed. <br /> The Plan of Record was thereupon amended, signed and dated <br /> by Nor. Consalve. <br /> With that she recommended a Negative II Determination. <br /> There being no Commission or public comment, the vice <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: Michael Talbot made a Motion for a legative II <br /> Determination; which motion was seconded by Ralph Shag and so <br /> voted unanimously. <br /> -5- <br />