Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: John Johansen made a motion to Close pending <br /> receipt of DEP number and proper notification to Massachusetts <br /> National Heritage; which lotion was seconded by Carole Moore and <br /> so voted unanimously. <br /> 7 : 05 Peter Garabedian for vista pruning at 86 Pimlico Pond <br /> Road, Assessors Map 3, Block 86 . <br /> The Chairman recognized Thomas Jalowy, representing <br /> Applicant, who made references to the plan as he described the <br /> proposed project . <br /> Mr. Jalowy proposed layering at the sides of the view <br /> corridor; with plantings to include blueberry, bayberry, <br /> chokeberry, viburnum, and inkberr . <br /> Mr. Sherman reported he has explained to Mr. Jalow k that <br /> the request for an extension beyond the view corridor is highly <br /> unusual and something the Commission rarely approves . <br /> The Assistant Agent has made an inspection of the property <br /> and has commented as follows: This area is beach forest which <br /> usually does not provide for plant growth. Michael Talbot <br /> concurred with this observation. <br /> Mr. Sherman reported on behalf of the Assistant Agent to <br /> deny the request for extension; she suggests Applicant return <br /> with a request for approval of a standard view corridor. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested Applicant consider a two-week <br /> continuance in the matter of the extension. <br /> . Jalowy requested a decision regarding vista pruning <br /> within the Griew corridor. <br /> Mr. Sherman explained the Commission would not be able to <br /> issue a combined decision at this meeting. He suggested the <br /> matters be addressed separately, which means Applicant would have <br /> to amend the order for the expansion matter. <br /> The Chairman expressed concern regarding any waiver granting <br /> an extension to the view corridor. He feels this would be <br /> contrary to the actions of the commission over the past several <br /> Fears. He also stated his opinion there are no compelling <br /> reasons to grant a waiver, and that he would be opposed at the <br /> time of a vote. <br /> Mr. Sherman requested a revised plan, eliminating the <br /> proposed expanded view corridor, to be referenced as the plan o <br /> record. <br /> -2- <br />