Laserfiche WebLink
There being no Commission or public comment, the Chairman <br /> entertained a motion. <br /> DoT o : Elliot Rosenberg made a motion for Negative 11 <br /> Determination;nation; which Motion was seconded by Ralph]. Shaw and so <br /> noted unanimously. <br /> 7 : 05 Barry and Marcia Store, Determination of Applicability <br /> to expand two bedrooms at 17 Compass Circle, Assessors Neap 105, <br /> Block 256 . <br /> The Chairman recognized Rick Landry, on behalf of Deanna <br /> Lynn Broadly, existing dwelling and proposed addition. <br /> Applicant, Mrs. Stone, was present. <br /> Diane Boretos clarified the two existing bedrooms are being <br /> expanded onto ars existing deck; no additional. bedrooms. <br /> Mr. Landry explained the proposed project, expansion of four <br /> (4 ft. ) feet from existing exterior wall . <br /> Ms. Boretos noted there is Board of Health approval of this <br /> project. <br /> The Chairman an recogni.zed George Green, who asked if notice i s <br /> required (within the 50-foot buffer) . <br /> Ms, Boretos responded a full notice of intent has not been <br /> required in the past (to her knowledge) for an existing footpr int <br /> f a used area/structure. <br /> There being no further Cor ni s s ion or public comment, the <br /> Chairman entertained a motion. <br /> MOTION: Ralph Shave made a Motion for Negative <br /> Determination; which motion was seconded by Elliot Rosenberg. <br /> Voting in the affirmative: John Fitzsimmons, Leonard <br /> Pinard, Elliot Rosenberg, Ralph Shaw, and Michael Talbot. <br /> Abstaining from the Vote: John Johansen. <br /> 7 : 10 Marie Jones, to amend the order of Conditions for S <br /> 43-1981 to acoonunodate water and power to three does at 379 <br /> Monomoscol Road, Assessors leap 125, Block 5. <br /> The Chairman recognized Richard Casa l.t, representing <br /> Applicant, who requested approval for power and water to three <br /> existing/approved docks and explained the proposed project. <br /> The Clerk explained that due to the nature of the project <br /> (digging) an Nos would be required, as fees for amending the <br /> order would be expensive. <br /> -2- <br />