My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/3/2002 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/3/2002 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 5:04:34 PM
Creation date
3/2/2018 1:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/03/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
middle of the road, everybody in New Seabury has the right to use the roads, and the <br /> roads are maintained by the pillage Committee, for which Tom Pressman is the contact. <br /> He said the only issue with this application as far as Mr. O'Hara is concerned 's in <br /> regard to the planting. <br /> Bob read a fetter from Rebecca Perry stating her plans for revegetation. He <br /> recommended a continuance or approval of the application subject to Diane's approval <br /> of the revegetation plan. <br /> Diane raised the issue of approval of the plan before the catch basin, which is on <br /> applicant's land, Is installed. Bob said if the work has to be dome on his land, Mr. <br /> O'Hara will have to give consent, either through another fifing or an amendment. <br /> Bob said it is Town Counsel's opinion that vire can compel New Seabury to pay for the <br /> landscaping as well as the drain. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the plan subject to <br /> Diane's approval of a reprised plan for revegetation. <br /> Bob requested a motion authorizing him to pursue getting the cooperation of the other <br /> parties in clearing the problem, even up to enforcement Of necessary. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to authorize Bob to pursue getting <br /> the cooperation of the other parties in clearing the problem, even up to enforcement i <br /> necessary. <br /> 7:30 P,m., Bemard Per stein, 161 Daniel's Island Road (continued from 9/19). Bob <br /> reported that the landscaper still has not contacted Bob to arrange a meeting, so the <br /> applicant has requested another continuance. <br /> Notion made, seconded and u nanirnously carried to grant the applicant another <br /> continuance to October 17 at 7:10 p.m. <br /> 7:36 p.m, Stephen Powers, 41 East Road continued from 9/19). r obvin Wilcox <br /> represented the applicant. Bob said he has verified the wetland line and we need more <br /> detail on a retaining wall and for containing runoff on a slope. He recommended a <br /> continuance. <br /> Motion made, seconded and unanimously carried to grant the applicant a continuance <br /> to October 17 at :30 p.m. <br /> In response to the Chairman's refusal to allow someone in the audience to give <br /> testimony, Elliot clarified that the State requires that only members of the Commission <br /> who have heard all the testimony with respect to a case are allowed to vote. When we <br /> have a continuance} the same members may not be present at the next meeting, or <br /> other members may be present who are not here tonight. <br /> 7.40 p. '1., Donald Blakeman, 56 WakebyRoad (continued from September 'I . <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.