Laserfiche WebLink
Masbpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals Minutes of January 22, 2003 <br /> setbacks had been met at-the time the lot was created however with current zoning <br /> changes they are seeking relief on both side setbacks, lot size, distance to wetlands, <br /> frontage requirements and lot coverage. Mr. Kirrane.believes this proposal will be more <br /> beneficial to the neighborhood although it does increase its non-conformity. He tells the <br /> Board that Mr. Clermont has a hip problem which necessitates him to have much of his <br /> living space on the first floor thus the reason for the increase in the foot print. Mr. <br /> Sanicki shows the Board the overlay of existing to proposed. The Board moves to grant <br /> the special permit as well as the following variances <br /> 14.5 foot variance on both sides <br /> - 65,600 square foot variance on lot size <br /> - 4 foot Variance to the wetlands <br /> - 75 foot variance for the frontage requirements <br /> - a 2.4% variance for lot coverage increase <br /> Conditioned upon engineering plans from Cape & Islands Engineering, dated November <br /> 125 2002, revised November 1 , 2002, revised January 22, 2003, File No. 12 MA as <br /> prepared for Edmond Clermont. <br /> All agree. So moved. <br /> Criteria to include SP -12 , and v 1-3, 1-4) <br /> Kurt and Cathy 1uarra : Request a variance from Section 174-31 and 174-21 ofthe <br /> ZoningBy-laws in order to construct a 22.' x 22' addition for a family room and mud <br /> room to heir existing louse. They are seeking relief from the currently required lot size <br /> and relief from the front yard setback requirements on property located in an R-5 zoning <br /> district at 40 County Toad (Map 71 Parcel 1 Mashpee, MA. <br /> Sitting: Diehard Guerrera, Zella Elizenberry and James Regan. <br /> David Sanickl from Cape & Islands Engineering represents the Petitioner. Petitioner is <br /> seeking to expand their existing house with a 22 x 22 addition for use as a kitchen, mud <br /> room and family room. Originally the dwelling was thought to be in a cluster however, <br /> after research it ends up not to be. They are seeking relief for the front yard setbacks <br /> from Dixon Drive, frontage relief and lot size relief. After some discussion regarding the <br /> lot and the fact that it is a corner lot, the Board moves to grant the following: <br /> - a 9.2 foot Variance on the front yard on Dixon Drive <br /> - a 4.8 foot Variance for frontage relief <br /> a 63,005 square foot variance for lot size relief, <br /> All agree. So moved. <br /> Conditioned on site plans from Cape & Islands Engineering, dated December 30, 2002, <br /> as prepared for Cathy Murray. <br /> Criteria to include 1- . <br />