My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/1/1984 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
10/1/1984 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 5:02:42 PM
Creation date
3/21/2018 2:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/01/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Health Meeting, October 1 , 1984 Page ) <br /> and topo, stratostr'u Lure and aquifer flow, we' re in the sane damn boat <br /> they are. " <br /> CHL: "Well, as you know Bill, we are keeping well abreast of this, we ' re <br /> throwing all -the regulations and everything. else into it, we 've even <br /> come up with some new ones, so we will keep you abreast if your will work <br /> with us, we can stop this I hope. We can make it the way we feel it <br /> should be. " <br /> CHL: "Thank you Bill for coming by and we will get a letter of to the <br /> Planning Bo ard tonight, the other one is wa to r s ed ge and they similarly <br /> tried to .get around that, the old cranberry bogs we' re going to pick up <br /> the nitrogen. " <br /> Mr. wool : "Have they reduced their density? <br /> HL B: "No,, not in watersedge. " <br /> CHL: "The only thing we got them on was what they were worried about, <br /> you could tell, was the nitrogen factor, and by going that route which <br /> we put in a regulation, alright, - which is a Town regulation now, it <br /> oers us. 1' <br /> Ir, Wool: "That' s wonderful! " <br /> CHL: "we did this to protect of course people like your water district, <br /> who are abutting usor coming in to re-charge and hope that someone else <br /> would do it on the other end, but they came back with this . . .what was <br /> it the bog was going to pick up. . . . . " <br /> 'B: " eh, that the cranberry bog shol.d be considered primary wetlands <br /> and Drimary wetlands- will reduce nitrogen as effectively and more effec- <br /> tively than any other method. that can be used and so they proported that <br /> there was a lateral flow from the septic systems that would be directed <br /> through the base of the cranberry bog area and that the mud mass and the - <br /> root mass down about 40 or 50 feet would effectively de-nitrify and. I ran <br /> that by (what her name no not Arlene Wilson she was proposing it. <br /> the hydrologist, Gabrielle Belf.it, and found heir figures most interes- <br /> ting and slanted. I ran it through my own calculator and I couldn' t conte <br /> up with the answers they were coming up with, , but we simply sent them <br /> a letter that we didn' t feel that their data was correct, and we let it <br /> go that way and- our final to the Planning -Board was that they would have <br /> to go tertial at least, we didn' t 'mention terFtial, what we said was that <br /> their water had. to be returned to the ground in Class A condition and <br /> that they would have to apply to DEAF; for their water drawing permits . " <br /> Mr. wool: "Are you talking community ells over there?" <br /> F'B: "Ther are going to have to, as near as we could get from DEQE. <br /> Mr. Wool: "Because o f the density?" <br /> FB: "Because of the density and the only way they can come out of it <br /> is to decrease each unit to bass than the 25 and I doubt that they can <br /> do that. " <br /> CHL: ' DEB is corning down, they are starting to enforce this, that' s <br /> why we've run into some of things we have here in town, they' re looking <br /> at this very closely. " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.