|
March 3 , 1986 , Minutes, Meeting
<br /> Page
<br /> Continuation of appearance of .Att Morris Kirsner
<br /> standing of it.
<br /> Mr. it n ?r: "Well the man I spoke to was a Mr. Ripa, Philip Ripa,
<br /> and I posed that question to him twice., and I wanted to stake ab-
<br /> solutely certain as to whether there was any lack of judgement,
<br /> whatever it aright have been. I said, supposing the new installa-
<br /> tion is not a cesspool but a septic tank and it' s a total upgrade
<br /> of the system and a tr mendouee improvement, which I 'm just as-
<br /> suming it would be; is a variance under those circumstances still
<br /> required, he said, 'absolutely so ' ,, " "I 'm j repeating& "
<br /> HL: "From one to another, we had Fagan, Connolly, Ripa was here,
<br /> we have discussed and Anderson was here. "
<br /> LCA: "Ripa wasn ' t here . "
<br /> CHL: "Ripa wasn' t here, OK. "
<br /> LCA: "Because he (Ripa) has nothing to do with it. "
<br /> CIL: "Therels. your people that we have discussed with, and also
<br /> members of this Board have discussed. it. "
<br /> Mr. Kir nerY ut the question is, where are we?"
<br /> HL: " eh, re 're giving you more protection in that area than
<br /> what you had, that' s the way we look at it; Morris ."
<br /> Mr. fir r er:
<br /> "Well , maybe so, on the other hand, and I pre-
<br /> ciat . . . ((interrupt)
<br /> CHL: "without infringing on, we feel., your rights. "
<br /> Mr. Kirsner: "Well, there we take issue . "
<br /> CHL: "I know we do, take issue, but that ' s our prerogative. "
<br /> Mr. Kirsner: " To question, but what you 've permitted i .up-
<br /> ate of a system, but I think frankly speaking, in a manner
<br /> where my private rights have been violated, I really think so
<br /> very sincerely, otherwise I wouldn't be, I like all you people,
<br /> I think highly of all you people, and it' s not easy for me to
<br /> be here, but ori .the other hard, being a property owner and
<br /> having been there for over thirty five year-s, I feel duty bound
<br /> to protect my own ?property ,interests, I also thinly this, that
<br /> nobody .1 tells me how to practice law, and I 'm not going to tell.
<br /> ars Board how they should function, but it would appear to me if
<br /> y -
<br /> a Board warts to do the very best, not only for the particular
<br /> applicant that they should have a schematic design of the ad-
<br /> jacent properties and the location of existing -systems, to de-
<br /> termine whether, or not, to do this, I 'm talking about existing
<br /> wells other than the applicant. "
<br /> CHL: "ewe go by that on everyone,.."
<br /> LCA: "There it is, it shows all the abutting wells* "
<br /> CHL: "Arey ou in back there, is it 1.3 from your well?"
<br /> Mr. I it n r: "No, I 'I not 13 5 ' , "1
<br /> CHL: "I 'm looking at that back thing, I don't know if it' s yours
<br /> or not, it doesn ' t give the name of the people.
<br /> Mr. Kirsner: "Lot #7, '-is Carter ' s, I 'm right over here Pointing
<br /> to the left hand margin of plan, his lot does not appear) , where ' s
<br /> Shore Drive?"
<br />
|