My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/7/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
3/7/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 1:16:28 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:14:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/07/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
totally going to up-grade to flood standards. They will fill in the <br /> foundation. He doesn't have to contend with distances to <br /> foundation. They are going to demolish the house and fill it right <br /> in. They will bring the house up higher to meet the flood zone <br /> requirements. <br /> Mr. Harrington is inclined to go along with this request too. His <br /> feelings were that the house is there. They are not changing the <br /> three-bedrooms. They can change the house all they want, knock <br /> it down, and build it up again. You can't get more compliant with <br /> the wetlands protection act. But, this system was put in as <br /> remedial. If you knock down the house in put in a three-bedroom <br /> house. That three-bedrooms is still on the property and is not <br /> changing. If they want to lift the house to be more compliant then <br /> all power to them. If they were going for a fourth bedroom. He <br /> would have other comments. But, they are not doing that. <br /> Mr. Doherty asked Mr. Ball if he had any questions and/or <br /> concerns. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that he agreed with Mr. Harrington's opinion and <br /> position. <br /> Mr. Doherty asked Mr. Ball to make a motion that upon Mr. <br /> Harrington's review of the O & M reports. If there is a problem <br /> they want it addressed. If there is no problem then he really <br /> doesn't see an issue with this request. <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to approve the applicant's request to keep <br /> the current septic system in place even though the plans for an <br /> addition have been changed to a demolition and new <br /> construction. The first condition is that the O & M reports will be <br /> reviewed by the health agent prior to final approval with the <br /> confirmation the proper working condition of the denitrification <br /> system. The second condition is that the house will remain a <br /> three-bedroom home. Mr. Doherty seconded the motion. The <br /> motion passed. <br /> A discussion took place regarding the floor plan and the specifics <br /> of the bedroom space and "loft" areas. Mr. Sanicki was satisfied <br /> that the health agents could review the plans and make <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.