Laserfiche WebLink
Y <br /> system will be 1011 to the existing well of house number five. <br /> There was much discussion between Mr. slavinsky and the Boil members <br /> in regards to the bedroom" issue surrounding this property. The house <br /> currently had one bedroom upstairs, which was more of a bunkhouse than <br /> a bedroom since there were six beds in the room itself. Mr. slavinsky <br /> stated that he would make a two-bedroom recommendation and revised <br /> design plan for this property, <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to approve the following seven variances: a A four <br /> foot variance from the proposed septic tank to the side property lime, b) A <br /> three-toot variance from the proposed septic tank to the street property <br /> line. c ten-foot variance from the proposed SAS to the street property <br /> line. d three-foot variance from the proposed SAS to the property line. <br /> e A six-foot variance from the proposed SAS to the basement, f local <br /> variance from the SAS to the wetlands. g A 491 variance from the SAS to <br /> the existing well of house number 5. Lastly, the agent will review and <br /> approve the revised plans for the two-bedroom house. Ms, Grady <br /> seconded the motion. The motion passed. <br /> Appointment: Cape & Islands Engineering - 26 water lay <br /> Mr. sanicki was present on behalf of the homeowners, He began b <br /> stating that the distance variances to the street lime and existing and to <br /> the existing foundation wall were granted in 2000. They were present this <br /> evening in order to discuss the interior plumbing issues. Apparently Mr, <br /> Gorda, the owner, had indicated to Mr, sanicki that the interior plumbing <br /> could not be re-plumbed clue to the interior construction and that the <br /> originally labeled cesspool is actually a 1,000-gallon septic tank. <br /> Therefore, they were presenting the board with revised dans dated <br /> 04.24.02 that reflect the changes discussed with the BOH. They are a <br /> follows: A) Use the existing 7,000-gallon septic tank as a pump chamber. <br /> B Pump to a 15001500 gallon two compartment septic tank. c The <br /> leaching facility remains unchanged <br /> discussion ensured between the Mr. Harrington and the BOH members. <br /> Mr* Harrington felt that Mr. Leo Jolly plumbing inspector from the building <br /> department should be allowed to inspect the premises in order to confirm <br /> that the upstairs bathroom could not be re-directed to the front of the lot. <br /> The plan was a good plan. He wasn't hugely comfortable having 100% of <br /> the flog go to a pump chamber with potential for failure. Granted there is <br /> one day's retention, which is allowed by code in the pump chamber that <br /> basically gives them one day to have the pump fined. The other thing that <br /> the BOH can do is requiring that back up poorer be provided or that the - <br /> hour retention is one of the requirements, <br /> 6 <br />