My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/13/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
6/13/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 1:21:23 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/13/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and appropriate precautions. <br /> Mr. Santos thought that it would be a good idea to include these <br /> pamphlets with the beach and transfer station sticker area for people to <br /> read and take with them. <br /> B. 1/A System Monitoring <br /> Mr. Harrington put this on the agenda because they have visited this topic <br /> before and the BOH denied it before regarding the approval of a request to <br /> change the testing from full time to seasonal. The state has now come out <br /> with an approval letter essentially approving people's request that their <br /> systems be changed from a yearly monitoring contract to a seasonal <br /> contract per local BOH approval. He would like to the BOH to revisit this <br /> topic even though they denied the applicants the first time. He wanted to <br /> make the BOH members aware that the state was allowing this request. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if the state was allowing this after a certain number of <br /> years. Don't they have to show a track record first? Usually it was one or <br /> two years before they were able to stop the testing. How long have these <br /> systems been out? <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that the systems were seven years old. The actual <br /> approval process started in 1995. What the state is allowing right now is <br /> rather than four times per year they are going to two times per year. The <br /> first is once within 45 days of start up and once within two weeks of <br /> system shut down. The state is basically making people notify them if they <br /> ever change the use of the property. They are leaving it up to the <br /> homeowner to say that they are not going to be seasonal we are now <br /> going to retire fully and now live in this full time. <br /> Mr. Ball replied that that was never going to happen. <br /> Mr. Harrington continued by stating that it makes enforcing and policing <br /> powers very difficult on the BOH end. They are requiring the systems to go <br /> in and the homeowner is saying that they are not using this so we are just <br /> going to sample it,two times a year. It will cut their costs in half. He would <br /> like to think some more on this issue. He would like to throw out the idea <br /> that if they are going to entertain this idea. He would suggest that a <br /> condition be that they sample two times a year but lengthen the term in <br /> which it gets sampled rather than just leaving it at two times year for the <br /> first two years make it four years or however long the BOH members see <br /> fit. It should help to see what would occur on a long-term basis. They say <br /> that the bacteria only live for three months. It takes three months for them <br /> to propagate to get to the point where you will get nitrogen removal. After <br /> 45-days he doesn't expect to see a lot of activity and then two weeks <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.