Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Mr, Santos again reiterated that this should be on the agenda for the next <br /> meeting for further discussion. <br /> Mr. Harrington continued that if they had been citing on their own on <br /> state illegal dumping or on their own Bol~! regulation they would have <br /> jurisdiction. <br /> Ms. Carron suggested that Mr. Harrington relay to the BOH members the <br /> scenario of the one that did go to court. <br /> IIIb. Harrington stated that the last two citations that went to court. The <br /> court waived the $300.00 fine and only made therm pay $50.00 or $100,00 <br /> in court fees. one of his directives back to the Selectmen will be that they <br /> should write a letter to the court and ask there to uphold their fines so <br /> that they at least get some reimbursement. It takes a lot of time to pursue <br /> this issue. Every department gets a copy of the citation. Each department <br /> has to take time to read it, file it and absorb it into their system. The <br /> $300.00 fine is a drop in the bucket. The BOH wanted to push for $1000.00 <br /> for the fine. But, the $300.00 is the limit because the state statue is the <br /> limit. That $300.00 everyday is a separate offense. They have the ability <br /> to fine on a day per day offeree. That is what they want the 130H to do. <br /> That makes more sense when you go to court and your have a larger dollar <br /> number you have a little more leverage. it doesn't help much when the <br /> court is waiving it anyways. They need to address that also in the letter to <br /> the Selectmen with their comments. <br /> D. FYI -- Pave Paws Meetin <br /> Mr. Santos stated that he hadn't made it to the last one. <br /> Ms. Grady stated that neither one of them did. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that it would be at the Bourne Best Western on <br /> August ", 2002. <br /> E. Water Department Directive - Water Ban <br /> Mr. Santos stated that he had some concems on the article in the paper. <br /> The Water Department carne up with a water ban. if he correctly <br /> interpreted their regulation and the way they wanted to handle this. They <br /> were going to fine the people who were washing their oars or watering <br /> their lawns outside of the specified times. They were going to fine you <br /> and then shut your water off. He has some problems with this directive in <br /> regards to health 'issues. He could understand the fines and after the third <br /> or fourth warning they shut the water off. However,, shutting someonegs <br /> water off after a first offense seemed completely unreasonable and <br /> 'I <br /> A <br />