Laserfiche WebLink
the BOH hadn't notified the public that they would be discussing this <br /> topic. Her thought was that they could just go ahead with the discussion <br /> and if there were any problems they could address them at a later date, <br /> Mr. Santos advised Mr, Harrington that they were going to move on with <br /> the topic. <br /> Mr. Harrington was reviewing the rules for posting. He confirmed that it <br /> merely stated that it had to be posted. it did not demand that it b <br /> conspicuously posted. The board can revisit this topic at any time. H <br /> felt that you could pull this topic out of the blue and talk about it at any <br /> point in time as long as a member wanted to do that. <br /> Mr, illlitrokostas asked hew this affected the vote. <br /> Ir. Harrington replied that the vete was legally binding. It wouldn't have <br /> to be posted to begin with, The meetings have to be posted. The meeting <br /> was posted. <br /> Ms. Warden continued by stating that this was not a public hearing <br /> regarding the smoking regulation. It was part of the agenda. It was a <br /> regular item on the agenda. If they wanted to hold another public hearing <br /> that was a different matter and they would have to publicize it. <br /> Mr. Santos wanted to make sure that they were handling things correctly. <br /> Therefore, they would be discussing it later in the evening. <br /> 1, sign Warrants, <br /> Warrants signed; <br /> . Approve minutes of May g 2002 and September ". 2002 <br /> Mr, Sall made a motion to approve the minutes of May *h1 2002 and <br /> September 5 t", 2002. Ms. Grady seconded the motion, Motion approved. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that the Executive session minutes from September <br /> t"1 2002 and September 1th, 2002 are continued due to potential <br /> litigation of the Smoking Regulation. <br /> s Request from Septic Installer to waive Installer's License requirements. <br /> Matthew Crocker, <br /> Mr, Harrington began by stating that he had sent a letter to Mr, Crocker <br /> regarding the installation of the septic at 32 surrey Place. The owners <br /> had produced evidence that they had paid Mr, Crocker$4000.00 to install <br /> a septic system. He aero them based upon the board's order for an <br /> installation of an illegal septic system. The letter gave him a certain <br /> 2 <br />