My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:18:20 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr, Ball countered that that was not discussed In Section 1. <br /> Ms. Grady stated that further on in the regulation would allover them to <br /> qualify as a "smoking bar", <br /> Mr. Ball suggested that they should add to this that section 1 and 111 is not <br /> compromised. Because section l did not cover that under the definitions, <br /> He did not see a definition for a "smoking bar" under Section 1, He felt that <br /> " should be as it is ream except at the end - sections 1 and Ill, <br /> Mr. Santos stated that they had to get moving along. He didn't have any <br /> problems with section c" as to how it was written. <br /> Ms, Grady agreed with Mr. Santos. <br /> Mr. Santos continued by stating that it still gave thein the ability to grant <br /> or not grant... <br /> Mr, Ball asked Mr. Santos to clarify the ability to grant or not grant what. <br /> Mr, Santos re-iterated that they could grant or not grant any variances. <br /> The board was the deciding body. They would determine whether or not <br /> Section 1 was being compromised by the requested variance. . <br /> Mr. Harrington recommended that the board members read just above <br /> Section 11 authority on the first page number three. 1t says "therefore" in <br /> the last sentence. <br /> Ir. Ball interpreted this part of the regulation as preventing the Tinderbox <br /> from have a smoking area. The Tinderbox could not do it regardless of any <br /> requested variances. <br /> Mr. Harrington confirmed that this section delineated "any enclosed public <br /> reap."They could grant a variance.that would be in direct conflict with <br /> Section 1. That would be his recommendation to the board. Whether they <br /> would grant it or not would be up to the board* <br /> Mr, Ball asked Mr, Harrington to re-stated his recommendation. <br /> Mr, Harrington re-iterated that he would recommend that the board <br /> members not grant the variance because it was in conflict with this <br /> particular section, <br /> r <br /> Ms. Grady asked if there had ever been anyone from the Tinderbox present � r <br /> at the meetings,. _ <br /> f r <br /> 41 Lil <br /> 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.