My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
12/11/2002 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:18:20 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. sanicki stated that the deal was that they wanted to consider the <br /> option to change the use of the building. It was going to cost him between <br /> $30,000.00 and $40,000.00 to upgrade it to a denitrification system, They <br /> are not looking at inexpensive numbers. <br /> Ir. Ball didn't follow the cost for each system. <br /> Mr. s nick explained that they would have to pull the tank and put in a <br /> denitrification systern. You have a flog-rate of say 6000. <br /> Mr. Ball reiterated that they would have to pull a tank and put a new one <br /> Mr. sanick! repeated that you would have pull the tank and pint a nes tank <br /> in with a denitrification system with a blower and electrical services. It <br /> couldn't surprise him if it didn't cost at least $30,000.00, Itwouldn't <br /> surprise hien. He didn't erre the true figures. He was just throwing it out <br /> as a guesstimate. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that the regulation was put in for a reason. Not to offend <br /> Mr. Ha ar$ but buyer beware. There is a lot of daily flow at that location, It <br /> is so close to the Mashpee diver. That is why the regulation is in place. As <br /> far as he was concerned, as a board M' ember, he wouldn't sway from that <br /> regulation. You need to put the denitrification in or find another option. <br /> The plan to drop the gallons per day or not to drop the gallons per day. <br /> What was their daily flow per day's Was it 20,000 gallons per day? <br /> Mr. Hajjar steed that it wasn't that high, It was 11 or 12,000 gallons per <br /> day. <br /> Mr, Ball stated that that was a lot per day. That was why they made <br /> Tul nian and the other property do it. <br /> 1r. sanick! asked if they were revising the BOH regulation to lessen the <br /> requirement from 10 to 20 parts per million. <br /> Mr. Ball asked.what the regulation exactly saidS <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that it specified 1in the effl.uent and a monitoring <br /> well that is within teen feet of the property line at the down gradient end of <br /> the property fine. You would also have to monitor for total nitrogen. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that they were trying to get to ten, if they couldn't get to <br /> fen they would get as close as they could. were they saying that they <br /> couldn't get to ten? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.