Laserfiche WebLink
to the slope side on the design plans. It is really not needed but it an extra <br /> precaution so they don't have breakout to the slope side. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that they had a quick drop there. <br /> IIT. Dalrymple agreed with him, <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to approve the variances as follows: A 50" <br /> variance from the well to septic regulation and a five-foot variance from <br /> the SAS to the abutter's property lima as noted in both the cover letter <br /> dated 01,23.03 and on the plan. Ms. Grady seconded the motion. Motion <br /> passed. <br /> 49 Septic Extension Requests Due to the Order Latter: 27 Elliot Road: <br /> Mr. Harrington began by stating that an order letter was sent to the owner <br /> of,the property because there was an inspection that was done more than <br /> two years ago. This was the response from the mother of the owner of the <br /> property. The parents lure at the property, The daughter is in Lenders right <br /> now and is planning to move back. They were requesting some additional <br /> time basically until the daughter moves back to tape care of this problem. <br /> Mr. Santos asked what the problem was at the time of inspection. <br /> Mr. Harrington reiterated that the system failed upon inspection. <br /> Mr, Ball asked if anyone was in the place now. <br /> Mr. Harrington reiterated that the parents were living there. <br /> Mr. Ball asked for details regarding the failure criteria. <br /> Ms. Carron stated that Ms. Connolly stated that they have never had any <br /> problems with it ever. <br /> Ilr. Ball replied that they all say that. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that the report noted that the cesspools were full at <br /> the time of inspection. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if they were overf awing or full. <br /> Mr. Harrington reiterated that they were full not overflowing. <br /> Mr. Ball asked who did the inspection. <br /> 7 <br />