My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/13/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
3/13/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:25:13 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:52:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/13/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a <br /> for sic months. They made them fully aware of the change in the <br /> regulation even though it wasn't in full effect. They at least had the April <br /> 1111 2003, in place and they knew it. The town of Falmouth said that they <br /> would follow suit after they did something. It was up to the board to give <br /> therm the additional time to take care of their outside seating areas. <br /> Some of therm have already begun that process. Thea it is up to the beard <br /> to do that. He did take into consideration that what would Falmouth do if <br /> they extend it. What if Falmouth decides to extend it after the fact? It <br /> was ultimately up to the board. There are arguments both ways, <br /> Mr. Santos added that he remembered talking to board members in <br /> Falmouth. Their original agreement was based on a compromise with the <br /> restaurants and bars. They would invest the money for the ventilation <br /> systems and they would postpone a ban for five years. They stuck to that <br /> agreement. Then when they found out that I lashpee was going institute a <br /> ban. They decided to re-visit their smoking regulation at the end of five <br /> years. <br /> Mr. Harrington asked if they should continue this until they have a full <br /> board. <br /> Mr. Santos felt that that was the way to go. <br /> i <br /> i <br /> Request For Extension - 68 Timberlane Drive <br /> Failure by inspection not repaired within two year. <br /> Mr. Harrington began by stating that this was a failed septic system that <br /> had been failed and not repaired within a two-year period. The board seat <br /> the homeowner a notice stating that it was greater than the two years. <br /> The homeowners are requesting some additional time to at least have it <br /> inspected. These properties are on wells and ultimately will be <br /> connected up to town water. He had not personally spoken to the owner. <br /> He was just in receipt of the letter, which he then placed in front of the <br /> board. It would appear to be a relatively straightforward deal. He is <br /> looking for an additional 30 days for the property to thaw and then open <br /> the system up. None of the systems have been able to be open due to the <br /> cold wether. <br /> Mr. Santos asked who originally failed the system. <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that it was John Grad, a septic inspector. It was a <br /> transfer inspection. <br /> Mr. Santos asked if it was a transfer of ownership. <br /> Mr. Harrington confirmed that that was correct. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.