My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/27/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
3/27/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:28:13 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:53:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/27/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> ti <br /> y. Variance uest: 331 Cotuit Road <br /> Mr. Harrington began by stating that this was a proposal for a one- <br /> bedroom home for Cotult Road. The variances are listed on the plan. This <br /> was an area that was all originally approved with 1001 to we]1s rather than <br /> the 1501. It is a vacant lot with new construction in an older area. This <br /> property will be connected to town water. There are some properties on <br /> town water to the north. The well that was installed to the east had to be <br /> moved for 34 Forest toad. There is no town water on Forest Road. They <br /> are as far away as possible for that. A deed restriction will b required <br /> because the leaching is provided for less than three-bedrooms. <br /> Mr. Ball made a motion to approve the following variances. The first <br /> variance is from house number 34 well to SAS of 4". The second variance <br /> is from house number 34 well to reserve of 401. The third variance is from <br /> house number 325 well to SAS of 451 and a fourth variance from horse <br /> number 325 well to reserve of 371. <br /> Mr. Santos asked if abutter notification was necessary in this "natter. <br /> F <br /> Mr. Harrington asked if this pertained to the less than 1501 regulation. No, <br /> only if It is less than the state requirement, which is 100'. <br /> IwAr. <br /> Ball asked if this wasn't necessary for new construction. He thought it <br /> was a policy to notify abutters if there was a possibility of affecting other <br />- peoples" wells. <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that they haven't done that for wells. If it were <br /> less than 1001 they would notify the abutters. <br /> Mr. Ball didn't think they had granted down to less than 1001. He had <br /> forgotten how that policy was writteno <br /> IVIS. Warden stated that if was a pre-established zoning for an old <br /> subdi ision. <br /> Ms. Grady seconded Mr. Ball's original motion, Motion passed. <br /> DISCUSSION: <br /> A. Woodward & Curran Jit Quarter 2003 Landfill Monitoring Report <br /> Mr. Santos began by stating that this was a pretty straightforward reports <br /> There were no hits on the quarterly monitoring, This was pretty much an <br /> FYI. He asked Mr. Harrington if he concurred with this assumption. <br /> Mr. Harrington agreed with the exception that the report noted that two <br /> vents needed to be repaired. He thought that he could take care of it. He <br /> 1 <br /> '4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.