My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/15/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
5/15/2003 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:35:23 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:55:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/15/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
wind. It was not going to gain them anything. <br /> Mr. McEntee added that he was requesting a variance for the local up- <br /> grad approval for the one-foot reduction between the separation of the <br /> system and the maximum high ground water elevation. They have a <br /> groundwater monitoring well there, He understood that the board typically <br /> required a denitrification system in that type of circumstance. But, he <br /> would like to make an appeal in this particular instance because there is <br /> such a financial hardship with these folks that that reduction be granted <br /> without the need for a denitrification system. If he didn1 get that he <br /> would have to pert in a mounded system. it would be a foot higher that the <br /> existing grade. He wasn't sure if he could get away without a retaining <br /> gall. He was hoping that he could get away without it. The retaining wall <br />+= would really blast the thing through the roof as fair as the expense was <br /> concerned* A denitrification system would require a maintenance contract <br /> and he wasn't sure that these folks could afford the $500.00 per year for <br /> this cost, <br /> Ms. Warden had to agree with Mr. McEntee that in this particular instance <br /> there was a financial hardship. <br /> a <br />=, Mr. Bell re-iterated that they bought the home for one dollar and they have <br /> a financial hardship. He wanted to tell there right now hover he felt about <br /> this situation* He would not go that way. He would consider <br /> denitrification with a UV light-because of the wells and pathogens. They <br /> would have to prove to the board that that would create a hardship. <br /> Mr. Farrington interjected that something else that Mr, McEntee had <br /> under consideration was that they got an approval from the board pending <br /> the actual installation of the waterline. That it was approved based upon <br /> a connection to the rater. The necessity for the UV wouldn't b <br /> necessary because they would all be on town water at the time it got <br /> installed. <br /> k <br /> Ills. Grady granted to know if everyone was going to be on torn water. <br /> Mr, Harrington responded that his intent was to write a letter requiring <br /> everyone to connect to town water. The town regulations state that when <br /> there was potential for contamination allowed the board to tell therm to <br /> connect to town water* <br /> Mr, Ball brought up that the situation was pre-existing. <br /> Mr, Harrington responded that it didn't matter. They could do it for <br /> irrigation wells. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.