Laserfiche WebLink
Y• <br /> FIs. Garron added that there was a lot about this property that he didn't <br /> know. <br /> Mr. Harrington added that Dr. Patel bought this place without knowing <br /> about the 600 GPD regulation. He was going to be bringing hire in front of <br /> the board to bring him into compliance with the regulation. <br /> Mr. Sall felt that this was another Deer crossing. <br /> Ms. Carron added that the interesting thing that Dr. Soliz brought up was <br /> that It does not say on our permits anywhere that it was "non- <br /> transferable s <br /> Mr. Harrington noted that it was in the town regulation. <br /> Ills. Grady added that Dr. Patel paid this to the old owner. <br /> Mr. Harrington noted that they could provide it as a service. Ho w►everg <br /> people are supposed to come and look at the regulations before they buy <br /> a property. <br /> Ms. Grady asked if they didn't recently okay some neer septic upgrades for <br /> the La Planar Del sol. <br /> Ms. Garron stated that the house in the front was repaired. <br /> Mr. Harrington agreed that they did an emergency repair for the house <br /> with the apartments, it was last summer, <br /> Ills. Grady asked If that was a separate system than the hotel, <br /> Mr, Darrington responded that legally they should have caught it at that <br /> point, When that septic system failed it was all part of the same property. <br /> Maybe he didn't screw up to badly. It was two separate properties, our <br /> regulation doesn't kick in like Title V does calling it "one facility's, our <br /> regulation is written per property not per ownership. If they had done the <br /> regulation "perownership" it would have kicked in the 600 GPD regulation <br /> at time of failure or time of transfer. But, it was a separate property. The <br /> motel itself was over 600 GPD so when that property transfers or fails it <br /> .will have to be upgraded. <br /> Mr, Sall felt that he would go with whatever Ms. Grady wanted to do, <br /> Ms. Grady felt that Dr, soliz should have returned the $200,00 to Dr. Patel. <br />