Laserfiche WebLink
w <br /> 1 <br /> r <br /> w <br /> Ms. Grady rade a motion to rescind the original denial for 147 Shore <br /> Drive. Mr. Ball seconded the motion the notion passed. <br /> Mr. Santos made a motion to approve the following variances for 147 <br /> Shore Drive as noted in the cape & Islands letterhead dated November <br /> 13 t", 2003. The SAS wiII be 101 from the cellar wa11. The reserve SAS will <br /> be 10' off the street property lime. The SAS will be 951 from the wetlands, <br /> To mitigate the variance request please mete the following: The water <br /> main runs along the opposite side of the street. A 30-mil membrane will b <br /> installed along the nen-habitable area cellar wall and a Micro-FAST <br /> denitrification system is proposed. The approval of the use of a Micro- <br /> FAST T system will require two years of quarterly testing for nitrates and an <br /> o & M contract before issuance of an occupancy permit. Mr, Santos noted <br /> that the vent should be 311 on the plan, Plus, the locals and liner needed to <br /> be located on the plans. The board members gave the health agent <br /> permission to approve the revised plans upon submission. Ills. Grady <br /> seconded the motion. The motion passed. <br /> APPOINTMENT: Coastal Waste Management - Landfill Mo yin <br /> Mr. Ball announced the 7:15 appointment and steppers down from the, <br /> discussion of this agenda item clue to a conflict of interest. <br /> Mr. Raymond Esper was present on behalf of coastal Waste Management. <br /> Mss Grady began by advising Mr. Esper that the board requested his <br /> presence in front of the board to discuss the details of his contract with <br /> the town to mow the landfill. <br /> Mr. Santos interjected that within the last fiscal year the mowing was not <br /> completed properly. The DPW had to go out to now it. It had not been <br /> immediately brought to the board's attention. They had to mow around the <br /> retention pond and some other steep areas that had to be re-done. <br /> Mrs Esper stated that they had been doing this for four years. They have <br /> never had any previous problems with this. It had always been dome to <br /> everyone's satisfaction. When this was put out for re-bid they put their bid <br /> in on the basis of what they had been doing over the last four-years. The <br /> people carne back and said they I cannot understand him at this point.) <br /> Going back even further than that to answer Mr. Santos question more <br /> specifically. When the bid for this was originally put in, Ms. Warden could <br /> correct Frim if he was wrongg there was a bid that was submitted for more <br /> money. The reason it was much higher was because of some of the slopes <br /> that were present and the.inability of the machinery to get up on the <br /> slope. It required more individual handwork that was going to extend the <br /> price about go .o ..lhat happened was that the BOH at that point said <br /> 2 <br />