Laserfiche WebLink
l <br /> * IIIb. Santos asked what the inspection was for, charge of ownership? <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that it had been done for a transfer of property. It <br /> was bank owned and done at auction. <br /> Mr. Ball felt that this fell under"buyers beware" and the board had never <br /> done this before. <br /> Ms. Warden felt that they missed the point of the inspection. The soils <br /> were saturated and the system was in failures <br /> Mrs Santos stated that the system was supposed to handle it in any <br /> situation basically unless they overloaded the capacity. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they have two years to repair the system. what <br /> they were requesting was that they look at it within six months and if it <br /> was working a decision should be made at that point. <br /> Mr. Ball said no and felt that they were still going against the laws <br /> Mrs Harrington stated that the could get another two years use out of it if <br /> it worked for another two years because that was the time that they had <br /> to repair it. Typically he had found that once they get back into normal <br /> use they fail anyways, <br /> Mr. Ball asked for his recommendation. <br /> IIIb. Harrington stated that the letter did not represent any manifest <br /> injustice or hardship. <br /> Mr. Ball felt that she could come back in front of the board, but... <br /> Mr. Santos made a motion to deny the request for the appeal for the re- <br /> inspection <br /> -inspection of log Sunset Strip. Ills. Grady seconded the motion. Motion <br /> passed. <br /> 6. IFY2005 Bad et <br /> Ms. Warden stated that this was basically for the board to just review and <br /> agrees to send to Nle. Mason. <br /> Mr. Santos asked if it had already been sent up to Ms. Mason. <br /> Mr. Harrington replied that the memo had not been seat up to MIs. Mason. <br /> Mr. Santos stated that it was a good memo. <br /> 3 <br />