Laserfiche WebLink
} i <br /> 4 <br /> M <br /> 4 # <br /> 1 ; <br /> { have their green cards. We know that Mr, Langford go that information. It <br /> was tough to say that they didn't notify people because they did. It was <br /> tough to say that they didn't notify people because they did. The <br /> violations were there. <br /> Ms. Gromelski stated that in plain simple language. If she hadn't gotten <br /> this information. she would have said have you all made the necessary <br /> repairs to the soil absorption system. They would have said that they , <br /> made the repairs, But, they didn't upgrade the system and they would <br /> have looked at the lays to learn how they should upgrade the system. <br /> Ms. Marden interrupted and stated that she needed to remember <br /> something,,.They really didn't make the necessary repairs because when <br /> they took the cap off the line that went to the reserve that reserve had <br /> been failed many years. It was not a repair because both systems were in <br /> failure now the reserve and the primary. So that when they opened the <br /> cap they didn't do a repair. That was failed too. You couldn't just fisc that <br /> they just opened it up and used the reserve. so what they did was <br /> nothing. They didn't repair its The d-box was acting as a septic system for <br /> God knows how long because the cap was on the previously failed <br /> t system. There weren't any repairs made. They pumped the system* That <br /> was not a repair. There were no repairs made. <br /> Ms. Gromelski r -iterate that she was telling her from reading the law <br /> and she was corning into this not from a regular local knowledge. <br /> Interpreting the laws as they are in Title V repair is pumping and sloes <br /> not require construction,. Anything that requires construction goes back <br /> into the upgrade of the system. Upgrade of the system falls under the <br /> two-year regulation. <br /> Ms. Warden stated-that that was opinion. <br /> IVIS. Gromelski agreed that that was her interpretation, Just for them to <br />� <br /> speak to the board's counsel and that was where they were coming from. <br /> If they wanted her to put into writing for them she would do it, <br /> Mr, Sall stated that that was the end of the discussion. They needed t <br /> make a decision on how to proceed. <br /> Mr* Santos felt that they should make a motion to resolve the entire issue <br /> at the next meeting in two weeks. <br /> Mr, Harrington re-iterated that they were going to go beyond the original <br /> -days time frame, They needed to rescind the -days or extend to <br /> February t', 2004, which was the date of the next meeting. <br /> 1 <br />