My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/17/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
6/17/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:40:43 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:30:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/17/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> • <br /> IIT. Grady stated that they were not fined. <br /> Mr. Darrington responded that they wouldn't be fined until they failed to <br /> remove the seats. <br /> Mr. Santos re-iterated that they had the documentation to support that <br /> they had been in violation of the food code. <br /> Ms. Warden added that the last time they sent them a letter certified mail <br /> to remove the seats. Therefore, there was some documentation in file. <br /> Mr. Bail asked if carbo's was done to 70 seats. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they were down to TO seats. That was what he <br /> found them to be at. <br /> Ills. Grady wanted to know that if they told Mr. Haijar that he had six- <br /> months to get it into the ground or whatever the amount of time they <br /> thought appropriate. He would just have to go into litigation to put it off? <br /> Mr, Bail thought that Mr. Hajjar could postpone it for five years and they <br /> still wouldn't get their denitrification system. He felt that that was the- <br /> way <br /> heway Mr. Haj,Jar was going to go. <br /> IVIS. Carron asked Mr. Harrington if he hadn't said that if it entered the <br /> discharge permit it was out of the hoard's hands anyways, <br /> Mr. Harrington responded that if Mr. Hajjar didn't get below the 10' <br /> 1000 <br /> GPD he would have to meet the groundwater discharge permit program. <br /> He had'90 days from the time that he received the letter from the DEP to <br /> re-submit his application for the groundwater.discharge permit program. <br /> That would have been approximately 90 days from May 511, 2004, which <br /> was when they received it. He thought it was the same time that he <br /> received its <br /> Ms. Grady asked if he had 90 days to do what. <br /> Mr. Harrington re-iterated that the applicant had 90 days to submit the <br /> i <br /> required permits to department's regional office for the groundwater <br /> discharge permit program. <br /> Ms. Carron asked if litigation would stop that from happening. <br /> IVIr. Harrington wasn't sure. <br /> Mr. Ball assumed that it would. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.