My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/1/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
7/1/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:45:09 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:31:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/01/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IIIb. Harrington advised him that the down gradient waterHow was pretty <br /> much paralleling Rte 130, So he thought that it was heading more down <br /> toward where the hits were in a southerly direction. He didn't think it was <br /> going to be going down towards parcel one. He thought it was going to be <br /> going down... <br /> i <br /> Mr. l yth r interrupted r. Harrington and stated that they slid not know. <br /> that exactly. But, it was true. He didnI want hi <br />� m to forget that there was <br /> all this other run-off. They couldn't say that this run-offwouldn't find its <br /> way over here. What he was asking was that the test at the unit, which <br /> did have a port for testing. Father than trying to mach some level of <br /> treatment with tl7epossibi. . <br /> lity of it being tainted by this other water. He <br /> thought it would provide better results if it was tested at the unit, <br /> Somewhere in the test port down gradient either at the D-bo c or dip right <br /> into one of the leach pits. <br /> Mr. Harrington did not fully agree with hire as far as the surface drainage <br /> portion of it was concerned, But, the monitoring well that he figured in by <br /> looking at the groundwater contours that the DUSGS and the military had <br /> done in the area all shored the groundwater flow to be southerly. That <br /> would put the monitoring well somewhere along the southern property <br /> line. He figured if he put it even between where the t ooieach pits were <br /> and ten feet off of the property they would be testing essentially the same <br /> thing that was corning out of the leaching. Itvwras not like there was any <br /> distance from the system to the property line, He agreed with him <br /> regarding the right result as far as the variance. He was not sure as far as <br /> he was getting to it. He agreed that they would be testing the same thing <br /> that was corning out of the system because it was such a short distance. <br /> Mr. l yther continued by stating that also in that location, this was a <br /> parking area and the only area to keep the well outside of the parking <br /> would be that little triangular portion. He again points to the plan* <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that they could recess it in the ground. It did not <br /> have to be sticking out of the ground-. <br /> lr. I yther agreed with Mr. Harrington* <br /> Mr. Harrington Mated that he did not know if they would be gaining much <br /> by sampling everything that was coning directly out of those two leach <br /> pits, so if they wanted to sample at the system or the d-bo , which was <br /> going to be done anyways. They would have to do quarterly sampling for <br /> total nitrogen for the first two years anyways. That was part of the local' <br /> regulation, <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.