10/28/2004 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mr. Santos made notion to approve the request to appeal the decision. of the board . of health regarding 48 James Circle and the application for the septic loan program. He felt that due to the extenuating circumstance noted in the letter from the Baders this warranted the approval. Ms. Grady se onded.the motion. Motion passed. APPOINTMENT: Michael Grot ke P.E. — 86 Summersea Road IVIS. Grady noted that although Mr. Grotzke stated that he was not going to be present at the meeting. They could possibly review it anyways. Mr. Harrington stated that the board had continued this from the last meeting basically because new information was brought to their attention the.sane day as the meeting. He had no problem with the submittal of the application. He had already reviewed it. But, the hoard opted to continue the agenda item. The request was for a one-bedroom dwelling. The issues here were the variances to the coastal hank and wetlands. The property was located in a Zone H. The original application called for FAST system. However, the-FAST system had reached their limit as far as the use as a provisional approval a Zone H. So the technology had to be changed over to the Amphidrome. He had no problem with this system. He had reviewed it. The ultra- violet was added because of the distance to the coastal hank. The hone was essentially within 100' of the coastal bark. They were also waiting for the Conservation Commission to determine the resource area, which was the coastal bank. There was some question on that. That had since been done. He recommended approval. The DEP approval was necessary for the Amphidrome system under #. provisional approval. He recommended the approval of the variances as listed in Mr. Grotke's cover letter. He was not going to read it because it was a whole list of setbacks. An executed 0 &M contract, which would include total nitrogen sampling for the Amphidrome system would have to be done quarterly for two-years and it would include the.maintenance of the ultra violet light and sampling analysis quarterly for two-years for fecal coliforms. Those results would not exceed Zoo colonies per nil. A deed restriction would he required because it was less than three bedrooms. The deed restriction requirement was part of the provisional approval from the stale. He would also recommend staking,the property lines. Mr. Santos made a,notion to approve the following variances for 86 Summersea Toad: Setbacks. A variance is requested to allow the SAS to be installed 0.1 feet from the street property line in lieu of the required ten feet. Setbacks. A variance is requested to allow the reserve SAS to be installed 16.3 feet from the foundation wall in lieu of the required 20 feet. Setbacks. A variance is requested to allow the SAS to be installed seven feet from the westerly property line in lieu of the require ten-feet. Local Board of Health Regulation—Setbacks. A variance is requested to allow the SAS and reserve area to be installed 84 feet from the edge of the coastal wetlands in lieu of the required 100 feet. (The Amphidrome Process single-family denitrification unit with a UV light was provided to mitigate this variance). Setbacks. A variance is requested to allow the anoxic septic tank to be installed nine feet from the foundation wall in lieu of the required 10 feet. The BOH approved the'Title v design plans as varianeed with the following conditions: 1.. The specifications for the ultra- . 2.