My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
02/17/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:20:48 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:51:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Horsely added that there was a prior site plan before the Con Comm. He thought <br /> they might have gotten a permit for it. But, they were here for the septic. He-wanted <br /> to focus in on a specific area. <br /> Mr. Harrington had a comment on his review was about the four-bays in the <br /> retention area. They were trying to get away from having standing water. They were <br /> shoving a small six-inch berm before you get into. They were trying to get away <br /> with have the standing water. Father than holding back that area. He would <br /> recommend that those four-bays do away with the berm there so that it free flowed <br /> into the under drain or in the areas where the under drain was rather than trying to <br /> hold it back. That was his only comment on that, <br /> Mr. Santos asked what they meant by the four-hays. <br /> Mr. Horsey stated that what happened was that the storm water would go this way <br /> and this gray. <br /> Ir. Santos now understood what he meant by bays. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated haat they were doing it for reduction 1n velocity so that 1t Went <br /> into and allowed some sediment to fall out of suspension. In order to do that if it <br /> silted up it would become a little wading pool, which was exactly what they did not <br /> grant. <br /> Ms. warden asked if it just went from one to the next. Is that what they were saying? <br /> Mr. Horsely stated that it carne in here and this was the bio-retention area, <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that that would actually be a grass planted area. <br /> Mr. Henderson replied Haat this area would be shrubs. <br /> Mr. Harrington added that it would have an under drain with a perforated pipe so as <br /> the water percolates through the nitrogen will get up taken her the plants. <br /> Mr. Santos asked if they were using the best management practices for removing the <br /> nitrogen. <br /> Mr. Horsely stated Haat that was correct. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that that was what The Planning I epartmentwas looping for. <br /> But, the way The Planning Department had been doing it was either not providing <br /> any subsurface drainage. This met their requirements so that the subsurface drainage <br /> got taken away and would ultimately come out the through the wide Mange through <br /> the six inch conduit out into the wetland', which was fine. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.