My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/17/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
>
02/17/2005 BOARD OF HEALTH Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 5:20:48 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 2:51:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF HEALTH
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ball agreed that Mr. McGrath would have to give the board an inspection report <br /> in writing for future usage. <br /> Mr. McGrath stated that he could do that. <br /> Mr. Ball felt that that new information made it a little easier now. The system was <br /> not in failure in accordance to Mr. McGrath. He continued by stating that the <br /> Building A flows would be 5374 GPI . They would be required to pull the bull run <br /> valve and install the OAR system. That would satisfy the board on Building A. Then <br /> they would jump to Building D. They had a system failure at that building. What <br /> was the finding for Building D <br /> Mr..McGrath stated that he found the sane thing. There was an empty.pit and the <br /> other one had ' ofvid. <br /> Mr. Ball asked if he would provide the board with a report on that too. <br /> Mr. Harrington interjected that he wanted a report that eras d one n August th, <br /> 2002. Building D in this report stated that the leaching pit closest to building was ten <br /> feet deep and pit was full.-it was given a passing inspection even though one of the <br /> pits was found to be full. <br /> Mr. Ball stated that since then they had a new inspection. They were either going t <br /> i <br /> go by Mr. McGrath's findings or ... <br />' Mr. Harrington handed Mr. Ball the formal report used for the transference of <br /> property. <br /> Mr. McGrath asked Mr. Harrington which sketch of the pit was he missing. <br /> Mr. Harrington stated that It was for Building A. It was not,the sketch that was <br /> missing. It was the description of the pit that he was missing. He was reading that <br /> the page with the sketch was not an attached page. It was part of a report. Otherwise, <br /> there would be no description and some narrative on the condition of the leaching <br /> pits. <br /> (The tape ends and begins again with the following conversation.) <br /> Mr. Ball stated that Building-B was too, he believed. He asked if pit number one was <br /> closest to the building. <br /> Mr. McGrath states, "Pit number one, eight foot diameter by six--foot deep liquid <br /> level was four foot below invert. Scum line indicates liquid level has been as high as <br /> tiro-foot below invert. No evidence ofhydraulic failure, any damp soil, vegetation <br /> normal. Pit number two was under asphalt parting lot." <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.