Laserfiche WebLink
That is correct. There are design issues, cost issue sand parking concerns. However, if <br /> the cost to upgrade this building is possibly $300,000, to replace this arnount of sq <br /> footage would be 1.1 million. Ernie thinks it would be more than $300,000. <br /> Ernie asked what happened to the feasibility study and design work done previously? <br /> The internal design was a wonderful concept. How can we incorporate that into this site? <br /> Devin explained those concepts can be scaled down to fit this sized addition. This will b <br /> based on new population projection information. <br /> David Burton explained Helene put together a prograrn, which as put out to hid for a <br /> feasibility study which Darlene completed, That grew into an application for State <br /> funding. There were concerns at that time about demolishing this structure so it was thea <br /> decided to embrace this building. <br /> The Mate code is not black or white. we wart to learn more about possibilities for this <br /> building to be upgraded. <br /> Bonnie said previously,were designing to get funding from the state. Are we not doing <br /> that this time? Are we not concemed about incorporating all the Mate requirements? She <br /> has heard funding will not be available for 4-5 years. <br /> Helene explained the Mate required 20 year population projection figures. we have not <br /> ruled out Mate funding. Funding is done through a separate bond and we need to talk to <br /> our Legislators about more bond funds. <br /> Sheldon sloes not think it should be design for a low percentage of likelihood. <br /> Kevin asked the Committee is thev all agree that this site is the first choice? <br /> All Committee members agreed. <br /> Kevin said next the Committee will need a goad plot plan on this site and some decent <br /> preliminary rendering of what the "shell"will look like with a 15,000 square foot <br /> addition. The next step is to incorporate the amenities inside. <br /> Helene said there are code issues. Code used to required60 lbs per sq foot for stack <br /> space, not it is 150 lbs per sq foot. Use in this area gill be limited ,that has to be taken <br /> into consideration. <br /> David said computer, internet, video, storage and adminsitration could be incorporated <br /> here. <br /> 1s there a chart, from the previous design work,that shows sq footage needed for various <br /> programs? <br /> Ed thinks that information can be gotten from "the book". <br /> Sunxnnar r of accomplishments from this meeting: <br /> 1. Entire committee agrees the first pn'orit r is this site. <br /> . The Committee will reach out to Randall Emi Mashpee Common's architect) and ask <br />