3/13/1991 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

z Board of Appeals Minutes - March 13, 1991 2. Joseph A. Cerni lia and Howard Feldman - Request a Special Permit under Section 174-25.1.9 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to construct a pier, gangway and float in an R-3 zoning district for the joint use of property located at 105 and 111 Waterline South Drive (Map 125, Blocks 246, 247, 248) Mashpee, MA. (Owners of record: Joseph A. and Nancy M. Cerniglia, Pamela C. Feldman TR and Christopher Burden TR.) Members sitting: M. Makunas, E. Govoni, J. Friel Engineer Douglas Cameron represented the applicants. He presented plans for a pier to serve two lots. He said the plan represented a 26% reduction in size from an earlier approved plan. Mr. Makunas read a letter from an abutter, H. J. Cohen, in opposition to the petition. Mr. Braman stated float could not be located closer to saltmarsh. Mr. Cohen identified himself in the audience and reviewed the plans. He said he was concerned that; the .water was very shallow and boats would be hitting bottom. Mr. - "responded that the depths were accurate and deeper than Mr. Cohen had understood. Mr. Friel moved to grant the Special Permit under Section 174.25.1.9 per plans presented. Mr. Govoni seconded. All agreed. Patrick F. and Carol J. Enright - Request a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the side set back requirement in an R-3 zoning district on property located at 27 Sand Dollar Lane (Map 105, Block 88) Mashpee, MA. Members sitting: M. Makunas, E. Govoni, J. Friel Daniel Buckley of New Seabury Engineering represented the applicants. He requested a continuance after hearing objections to the plans from an abutter, Mr. Bernaducci. Mr. Buckley explained that the Enrights property has retaining walls which have deteriorated. They would like to replace the retaining walls and add a garage. Mr. Bernaducci explained that he was concerned that the excavation will cause fall off onto his lot. Mr. Buckley said size of renovations will have to be negotiated. Mr. Makunas suggested plans be revised to be mutually agreeable. Mr. Govoni, suggested that the garage foundation might be designed to provide the retaining wall. There was discussion that new plans be submitted for the April 10 meeting reflecting the changes. Mr. Govoni moved to take the application under advisement. Mr. Friel seconded. All agreed. Mr. Makunas explained that the Board would have to make a decision before May 19 or that the application could be withdrawn and submitted at a later date.