My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/22/2018 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/22/2018 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2019 1:06:25 PM
Creation date
4/25/2018 9:14:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/22/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resource Area: Land Under Ocean, Land Containing Shellfish, Salt Marsh, BVW,Coastal <br />Bank, LSCSF (Little River) <br /> <br />The Engineer from J E Landers-Cauley Engineering, represented the applicant. He explained the <br />proposed project consists of the razing of an old dock and pilings and reconstruction of the fixed <br />pier, ramp, float and two spring piles. The fixed portion of the dock will be permanent and the ramp <br />and floats will be removed each fall. The fixed section of the pier is proposed to be 50’ long and <br />supported by piles. The ramp will be constructed of aluminum railing and wood. The limit of work <br />will be delineated. He noted the proposed activity will have a minimal effect on the shellfish <br />habitat. He described the methodology of placing the piles. He gave the dimensions: new dock 4 <br />x 49 feet long, ramp 3 by 10’, float 8 x 16 feet and he also noted the placement of the piles. He <br />noted they have an order of conditions to put in vinyl sheet piling to replace the bulkhead. <br /> <br />The Agent showed some images of the property, existing dock, the bulkhead, coastal bank, salt <br />marsh. He read the comments from the Shellfish Constable and Harbormaster. The Harbormaster <br />stated the proposed dock is in close proximity to Little River Marina which becomes congested in <br />the summer months with boating traffic waiting to fuel their vessels. There have been objections <br />from neighbors concerning the distance of the proposed dock extending into the river. In his <br />opinion, the dock will extend too far into the river and will impede the safe navigation of vessel <br />traffic. The Harbormaster offered a plan showing a shorter version of the dock which will coincide <br />with the Shellfish Constable’s recommendation to have several pilings removed. The Shellfish <br />Constable recommended removing the six foot “L” shape and 10 feet of walkway on the proposal, <br />move ramp and float in and eliminate piling on the North end of the float. This would result in <br />eliminating four walkway pilings and one float piling to minimize the loss to shellfish habitat. <br />The Agent said he would defer to the expertise of the Shellfish Constable and Harbormaster. He <br />commented on the access steps over the dock and said the posts proposed to anchor these <br />access steps are not necessary and didn’t see the need for additional posts because it would be <br />an additional disturbance to the saltmarsh. <br /> <br />Mr. Cavossa stated he tried to reach out to all of his neighbors regarding this project. He said his <br />boat continually sits on the bottom and is digging a hole there every time they tie it up. He met with <br />the engineer to make some determination of what would fit in the neighborhood. He noted on the <br />plan the proposed dock and the other docks that are in proximity. <br /> <br />Rick York, Director of Natural Resources, stated this is a highly productive shellfish bed which was <br />noted on the application that this is land containing shellfish. The number of pilings impact <br />shellfish activity and in addition, he stated the Harbormaster recommend shortening the dock as <br />does the Shellfish Constable. He described the pilings proposed and which ones could be <br />eliminated. <br /> <br />Following a lengthy discussion, the engineer requested a continuance on behalf of the applicant in <br />order to work out the details. <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Luckraft, owner of property directly across from the proposed dock noted Little River is <br />very narrow. He noted his dock on the plan. He said if Mr. Cavossa builds his dock he will reduce <br />the distance on the river of navigable water. He noted the other docks in the area. It was noted <br />the navigation is not within the purview of the Commission. Mr. Luckraft also noted that he has <br />more than one boat and his second boat is docked elsewhere as there is no room for an additional <br />boat at his dock. He questioned the need to accommodate more than one boat in a dock design. <br /> <br />No further comments from the public <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.