Laserfiche WebLink
has agreed to this condition ahead of time so they can build that base in order to core back on <br /> an annual basis for a couple of years to resurvey the bottom. If there is a problem, then we <br /> a would need to address that problem. He noted the lift is for private use only and the boat is a 32 <br /> ft. boat. <br /> f <br /> The Agent questioned the plan for the existing pier and asked about what type of decking will be <br /> going over the-salt marsh. Mr. costa stated the decking will be thru-flow composite decking for <br /> increased sunlight penetration. The Agent referred to the Division of Marine Fisheries letter and <br /> requested that Mr. costa send them the revised plan as their comments reflected an older plan, <br /> He read the comments from the Shellfish constable into the record. He said if the <br /> Commissioners approve this project he would sit down with the Shellfish constable and craft <br /> conditions in case there is any adverse impact to land containing shellfish that there would be <br /> appropriate mitigation action to restore that area and the commissioners would reserve the right <br /> to require additional measures including the possible removal of the boat lift if the damage to <br /> shellfish habitat became systemic.- <br /> No <br /> ystemic.fro comments from the public <br /> Lotion: Mr. Sweet roved to close and Issue with conditions discussed, seconded by <br /> Mr. Anderson. vote unanimous 4-0 <br /> 06 Donna Beckett Lebeoh 1, Trustee, 161 Timberland D rive. Proposed construction of <br /> single-family home, garage, septic system upgrade, landscapinglhardscapin . At <br /> request of commission, continued from 12114 to submit reprised plans. <br /> Resource Area: inland Bank, Buffer Zone to Inland bank, Land Under <br /> Wate rood iesWate rways, and Bvw. (Santuit Pond) <br /> Jack Landers- auley, Landers cauley Engineering, represented the applicants. Mr. Landers- <br /> cauley stated he has submitted a mitigation planting plan as requested by the Commissioners <br /> at the december , 2017 hearing. He reviewed the proposed project of a new single family <br /> dwelling with attached deck and one car garage, construction of two retaining walls, placement <br /> of an onsite I!A septic system, construction of a paved driveway, placement of a leaching basin, <br /> and landscaping of all disturbed areas. He referred to a letter submitted by the applicant in <br /> which she stated she owns the property and bought the property a number of years ago and <br /> was hoping the sale of her property would be for her retirement. He reviewed the mitigation <br /> plan and stated there is a great deal of detail in the plan. He said because of the input of the <br /> Commissioners, they moved the leaching pit and placed a leaching trench directly below the <br /> deck. He described the limit of work and the path leading down the coastal bank with no trees <br /> to be chit down. He explained there was not enough land to come up with the necessary <br /> mitigation f-or this lot per the regulations because the entire lot is subject-to the mitigation <br /> requirements. He stated the mitigation plan presented shows 944 plants and an additional 682 <br /> plantings would be necessary to meet the regulations and there is no available space to do so. <br /> He noted Board of Health approved plans, with variance relief for a Title v leaching facility with <br /> an I/A to accommodate a proposed three bedroom dwelling. <br /> The Agent stated he has not had a chance to contact town counsel regarding alternative <br /> mitigation because there is nothing in the regulations allowing for alternative mitigation. The <br /> Agent review regulation 172-7 which is the criteria for waiver requests. He stated the planting <br /> plan is an aggressive plan and felt the performance standards have been met for the bank and if <br />