Laserfiche WebLink
the Commissioners were to approve the project, he suggested that the required three year <br /> monitoring of mitigation plantings' be extended to 4 }rears. <br /> The Commissioners had several concerns. with the elevations in the back of the house and <br /> under the deck, the grades on the driveway with stormwater running down the driveway, and the <br /> steepness of the bark pathway (runoff and safety concerns). Additional questions about the <br /> trees near/in the road shoulder...are they to be removed or remain. They requested more <br /> information on these issues. <br /> The Agent stated the pathway needs to be constructed in such a way that runoff doesn't occur, <br /> He said he would like to see more detail and noted access pathways are allowed under the <br /> bylaw but the applicant needs to figure out a design to avoid runofflerosion on the bank. <br /> Mr. ca uley-Landers requested on behalf of the applicant a continuance in order to present <br /> revised plans. <br /> No comments from the public. <br /> Motion: ill'lr. Sweet moved to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant to <br /> January 25, 2018 at 6:12 p.m., seconded by Mr. Cook. Mote unanimous 4-0. <br /> 6.09 Waquoit Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (Applicant), O-Beach Wills <br /> Waquoit Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (Applicant), O-Beach Wills Work Road <br /> Proposed saltmarsh study. (owners of record: Commonwealth of Massachusetts and <br /> Town of M ash pee). N o I <br /> Resource Area: LSCSF, salt Marsh <br /> Jim Rassman (Waquoit Bay Reserve Stewardship Coordinator), represented the applicant <br /> (Waquoit Bay Estuarine Research Reserve). He described the proposed project as research to <br /> conduct a saltmarsh study (thin lager placement) on property located at o-Beach Wills Work <br /> Road. He said they will be placing sediment on experimental plots (rood framed boxes) to <br /> assess salt marsh resiliency to seal level rise. There are 8 other such studies taking place <br /> around the country. This is a classic proposal where there are 5 blocks and 5 different <br /> treatments. He explained the process using the plans provided. There will also be a tracking <br /> process monitoring the sites and should there be any kind of damage or adverse im-pact as a <br /> result of this study, the study will be shut down and restoration measures will be taken. He <br /> commented they will be coming back to the commission annually to share the results. <br /> No public comment <br /> Motion: fir. Sweet moved to close and Issue, seconded by Mr. hook. dote unanimous �� <br /> 0 <br /> 6:12 Daniel A. & Linda G. Wren, 78 Waterline Drive south. Proposed construction of a <br /> covered porch onto existing dwelling. RDA <br /> Resource Areas: Flood Zone. LSCSF <br /> Anna Mclntee, Engineering Works, Inc., represented the applicants.. She explained the work <br /> will consist of constructing a screened in porch on the left side of the house. The proposed <br />