Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> of the ear was on Millennium and used a different type of report. The figures from <br /> each had to be combined and it was somewhat like adding apples and oranges. -Borne <br /> data didn't transfer smoothly between the two systems, The MLC is aware of the <br /> urp rade ,process and realizes this year's data will be approximate. A second part of this <br /> report, which deals with finances, is due to the MBLC in October. <br /> Network Inns <br /> The upgrade to Millennium nnium has made all CLAMS libraries aware of the need for more <br /> standardization in loan rules and overdue fines. Formerly, both were tied to location <br /> and patron. Now both are triggered by the individual items loan rule. For example, a <br /> i l shp e patron-might get a Sandwich video, which goes out for two days instead of <br /> seven days and had a different fine rate than the Mashpee iter. This gets confusing <br /> and difficult for patrons to remember. we have discovered that having standardized <br /> policies throughout CLAMS makes it easier for patrons to go from one location to <br /> another and feel confident that they know what the loan rules are. Members also felt <br /> that some of, the limits were too punitive and prevented patrons from retuning items <br /> because the fines owed were more than they could-afford. They also voted to have a <br /> lover firm structure for children's items since they go out in larger quantities and the <br /> penalties could add up quickly.ly. As of October, the new loan periods and fine structures <br /> are: <br /> Material Types Loan periods Fines Maximum <br /> Books 14 days .10 day $3.00 Adult, $1.00 child <br /> Audiocassettes 14 days .10 day $3.00 Adult, $1.00 child <br /> 0 ,r <br /> Magazines 14 days x.10 day $NOAdult, $1.00 child <br /> Videos DVC s 7 days $1.00 $3.00 Adult &.child <br /> The Bourne Library had already lowered their maximum fines. They reported that they <br /> have been experiencing a greater rate of return for late items. It was noted at the old <br /> video maximum, five late videos would create a $50.00 overdue charge. This can be a <br /> great hardship for-many families. I think this will be.a positive step for patrons and <br /> hopefully rake getting late items back easier. Unreturned items would still be billed for <br /> the replacement costs. <br />