Laserfiche WebLink
He stated there are a number of provisions dealing with <br /> setbacks from water bodies . Currently there is a seventy-five <br /> foot setback required. from Routes 28 and 151, the amendment <br /> would allow for a lesser setback. There is a fifty o foot <br /> buffer required along Routes 28 and 151 in an attempt to Maintain <br /> the landscaping character of the major corridors, which buffer <br /> could be varied by the Planning Board through the Special Permit. <br /> The parking issue will be difficult for a developer to deal <br /> with because they will have to meet all parking requirements for <br /> the amount of square footage of the different types of uses they <br /> provide, with the option of doing so on the lot itself . This <br /> would allow for an overall shared parking scheme to be developed <br /> that provides all required parking for the project, which may be <br /> located in a number of "parkin lots" shared by a neer o <br /> businesses on different lots . The developer will be responsible <br /> to demonstrate to the Planning Board, as part of the Special <br /> Permit process, the mechanism to insure the maintenance, <br /> operation, and construction of said, parking lots. on-street <br /> parking is allowed., but does not count toward minimum parking <br /> requirements of the project . Parking structures are allowed. <br /> The number of direct vehicle access points are restricted to <br /> Routes 28 and 151 . A specification for street construction is <br /> provided. <br /> Mr. Fudala reviewed Page -3- Section H which deals with <br /> architectural. controls . He explained it is not a specific set of <br /> standards, but that through proposals and the Public Hearing <br /> process, everyone should be satisfied by way of the Town' s <br /> abilities of enforcement of the Conditions of the Special. Permit, <br /> and the required recording of the ]deed restrictions . <br /> Mr. Fudala continued to explain that Section I allows the <br /> Planning Board to approve subdivision lots within the development <br /> pursuant to the Special Permit. It is a double process whereby <br /> a Special Permit is issued under the zoning statutes to construct <br /> a cluster subdivision, and a subdivision approval under the <br /> Subdivision Control Law. No Jot may be created that does not <br /> meet the minimum lot area and frontage requirements of the zoning <br /> district unless said lot is serviced by a public or private <br /> wastewater treatment facility approved by the Planning Board <br /> under the Special Permit . <br /> Mr. Fudala pointed out one item he would like Town Counsel <br /> to review is the condition requiring written approval of the <br /> Mashpee Fire Department regarding the distance and location of <br /> one or two- story primary structures . <br /> If a project is located within the groundwater protection <br /> district, impervious surface coverage requirements would apply. <br /> 1r. Fudala also reviewed required application materials, <br /> maximum allowed lot coverage allocations, detailed plan o <br />