My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/1/2006 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
>
12/1/2006 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2018 5:26:01 PM
Creation date
5/9/2018 1:26:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/01/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
impacts on our bays. Most such stormwater measures will require fairly significant land areas for <br /> nitrogen Mitigation, very little of which appears to be provided on the dev ioperfs current site plan. <br /> Because of the nitrogen issue, the developer should be required to adopt strict measures to deal with <br /> nitrogen impacts from stormwater runoff and fertilization, including use of nitrogen-reducing <br /> stormwater facilities such as bioret radon areas, grassed scales or gravel v ed ands, and use of <br /> organic fertilizers. <br /> Because the residential development and its panting areas are also located within-the'recharge area <br /> of a permitted public grater supply well, all stormwater should be directed to solid catch basins to <br /> allow evaporation of volatile organics as well as containment of any fuel or hazardous material ills <br /> } p <br /> prior to overflow to the nitrogen-reducing facilities noted above. All roof runoff should be directed <br /> onto lawn areas or to the paring lot drainage system and not directly to any subsurface leaching <br /> facil ity. <br /> FISCAL MUNICIPAL SERVICES IMPACTS <br /> No fiscal impact analysis has been done for the project. Based on previous studies done for other <br /> residential projects, the pr jecf's residential component is likely to have a negative fiscal impact on <br /> the Torn. This may be compensated for to some extent by the commercial industrial component. <br /> The preliminary architectural plans for the proposed buildings are generally quite attractive and <br /> except for the 3 story height (zoning limits height to 2 1 stories in most of the torn, with certain <br /> special provisions for a third story through transfer of development rights) are consistent with <br /> muldfamily construction permitted in other parts of the town. <br /> SUMMARY <br /> The site, although not end rely consistent with the Town"s adopted plans.:'and zoning, appears <br /> workable for the proposed use, particularly given the town's demon strat d need for apartment <br /> housing and the disinterest shown, to date, by most other 40B developers in providing rental <br /> housing. The combination with industrial.and commercial development presents some challenges in <br /> teras of site design and buff n'ng of residences, but is not unprecedented in the torn and may <br /> provide the economic basis for feasibility of the project. <br /> Many of the details of the slt plan require more careful planning and review to deal with issues such <br /> as public safety, stormwater management, parking, interrelation of the buildings and buffering from <br /> the industrial area and adjacent sand pit. <br /> Water quality impacts will be of primary concern, requiring the highest levels of wastewater <br /> treatment and stormwater management to minimize nitrogen loading to our bags. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.