My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/14/2008 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
>
8/14/2008 PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2018 1:41:37 PM
Creation date
5/9/2018 1:39:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Land Use: 110 <br /> General Light Industrial <br /> Land Use Description <br /> Light industrial facilities are free-standing facilities devoted to a single use. The facilities have an <br /> emphasis on activities other than manufacturing and typically have minimal office space. Typical light <br /> industrial activities include printing, material testing and assembly of data processing equipment. <br /> Industrial park(Land Use 130)and manufacturing (Land Use 140)are related uses. <br /> Database Description <br /> The database consisted of a mix of suburban and urban sites. Parking demand rates.at the suburban <br /> sites were similar to those at urban sites and therefore the data were combined and analyzed together. <br /> • Average parking supply ratios: 1.1 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. GFA (five study sites)and 1.3 spaces per <br /> employee (four study sites). <br /> • Average site employment density: 1,200 sq. ft. GFA per employee(five study sites). <br /> The number of employees for this land use was the total number of employees working on all shifts. <br /> Facilities with employees that work on shifts may peak at different hours. It is unclear from the data <br /> collected for this land use whether the parking demand counts occurred during, prior to, or after shift <br /> changes at the study sites. <br /> Four sites that were submitted were substantially smaller than the other sites contained in the database. <br /> The sites ranged in size between 1,200 and 5,100 sq. ft. GFA and employed between one and nine <br /> persons. The peak period demand observed at these four sites was 1.13 parked vehicles per employee. <br /> The parking demand information from These sites was excluded from the data plots and analysis. <br /> Study SitesNears <br /> Anaheim, CA(1984); Dallas, TX (1985); Oklahoma City, OK(1987); Glenview, IL (1990); Anaheim, CA <br /> (1991); Seattle, WA(1999); Norristown, PA(2001) <br /> Institute of Transportation Engineers <br /> 30 Parking Generatlon,3rd Edition <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.